Kashi Nath Misra vs Vikramaditya And Others
Judges: O Prakash
17 August, 1992·5. In Daulat Ram Chauhan (supra), the Supreme Court dilating upon the question as to what are the material facts and particulars in regard to the charge of corrupt practice, observed: "We must remember that in order to constitute corrupt practice, which entails not only the dismissal of the election...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bijay Singh And Others vs Additional Dist. Judge, Iind, ...
Judges: A Banerji
17 August, 1992·5. I have heard Shri G. C. Bhattacharya, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri A. N. Bhargava, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. The first submission of the learned counsel-I for the petitioners is that as the judgment and decree of the Court dated 28-5-1986 shows that the Court ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Thomas Jaikab vs Union Of India (Uoi)
Judges: S Dhaon, D Sinha
16 August, 1992·4. We have heard the petitioner, who had appeared in person and we have also gone through the petition more than once, which is in the Hindi language. 5. Neither the right to get an employment, nor the right to get food, nor the right to get clothing, nor the right to get shelter has so far been rec...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Saraya Sugar Mills (P) Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: O Parkash, R Gulati
12 August, 1992·2. We take up these questions seriatim. 3. Facts regarding question No. 1 as found by the Tribunal are that the assessee, a private limited company, engaged in the manufacture and sale of sugar and molasses, received rebate and remission aggregating to Rs. 25,27,198 in the previous year ended on Oct...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Surinder Prakash Goel vs The State Of U.P. And Others
Judges: S Agarwala, M Katju
12 August, 1992·7. Rejoinder and supplementary rejoinder affidavits have been filed and we have perused the same. 8. The above facts reveals that there were three enquires against the petitioner. The first enquiry report is that of the Additional District Magistrate (City), Ghaziabad, Shri M. M. Mishra which is Ann...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Mahendra Kumar Bansal
Judges: O Parkash, R Gulati
12 August, 1992·1. These are three applications made by the Revenue under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, requiring us to direct the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to draw up a statement of the case in all the matters and refer the following common questions to this court for its opinion : "1. Whether, o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs U.P. Laminators (P) Ltd.
Judges: O Parkash, R Gulati
11 August, 1992·2. The assessee-company is a private limited company in which the public are not substantially interested. Its accounting period for the assessment year 1975-76 under consideration is the calendar year 1974. It claimed during the accounting period under consideration that unabsorbed depreciation and...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Champaran Sugar Co. Ltd.
Judges: O Parkash, R Gulati
11 August, 1992·1. At the instance of the Revenue, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following question under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, relating to the assessment year 1068-69 to this court for its opinion : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Additional Commissioner Of ... vs Badri Prasad Kashi Prasad
Judges: O Parkash, R Gulati
10 August, 1992·1. At the instance of the Revenue, the following question has been referred to this court for its opinion : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in cancelling the penalty of Rs. 5,000 imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 196...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hemendra Chaudhury vs M/S. Punjab National Bank And ...
Judges: B Dikshit
07 August, 1992·2. This revision is not maintainable. No revision lies against an order allowing application for producing documentary evidence which was not filed at appropriate stage in accordance with Order 13, Rule 1, C.P.C. It is not a 'case which has been decided' for the purpose of Section 115, C.P.C. This v...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.