Gorakh Nath Yadav vs Parshuram Singh And Others
Judges: N Ganguly
20 April, 1992·3. The opposite party No. 1 pleaded in his election petition that date of birth of Gorakh Nath was 1-12-1964 and on the date of filing of the nomination i.e. on July 1988 he was not of 30 years of age. The election was materially affected by the acceptance of the nomination paper of the petitioner. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Bilas Purshottam Dass vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: A Singh, R Gulati
17 April, 1992·Income Tax Act 1961 s.271(1)(a) Income Tax Act 1961 s.271(2) JUDGMENT R.K. Gulati, J. 1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following question under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as " the Act") ; " Whether on the facts and circumstances of the ca...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
U.P. State Road Transport ... vs Shobha Devi Andey And Ors.
Judges: D Sinha
17 April, 1992·2. This appeal, under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, hereinafter called the 'Act', is directed against the award dated 6th December, 1979 given by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kanpur, hereinafter called the 'Tribunal' in Motor Accident Claim Case No. 25 of 1975 between Smt. Sh...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kweens Bar And Restaurant vs Regional P.F. Commissioner
Judges: P Gupta
16 April, 1992·5. The contention of the petitioner is that one S.K. Mukherjee got stroke of Paralysis and was lying ill since 10.10.1987. One Attar Singh was taken as a substitute in his place Attar Singh could not, therefore, be counted as an additional employee working in the petitioners firm on 26.5.1988. Regar...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dharmendra Singh vs The Principal, S.K. College, ...
Judges: P Gupta
16 April, 1992·2. In para 5 of the counter-affidavit it is stated that the petitioner was not given the combination of Zoology, Botany and Chemistry as he had not obtained the requisite number of marks required by a candidate for getting admission in that combination. Instead the petitioner was offered the combina...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
D.D. Vyas And Others vs Ghaziabad Development ...
Judges: O Prakash, M Katju
13 April, 1992·6. No counter-affidavit having been filed, the averments of the petitioners that the open space, namely, Adu Park, as shown in the plans (Annexures-"1" and "1-A") to the petition,) was earmarked for development of a public Park, that no steps whatsoever have been taken so far by the respondents to d...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Kumar Bhatia And Others vs The State Of U.P. And Others
Judges: O Prakash, A Singh
10 April, 1992·3. that notification under S. 6(1) of the Act was issued without application of mind and, therefore, that is invalid; and 4. lastly, Sri Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioners urged that they were discriminated against others and, therefore, the acquisition proceedings are violative of Art. 14...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shree Shankar Straw Products vs Union Of India (Uoi)
Judges: R Misra
09 April, 1992·"The value of the clearances of both straw board and rice during the financial years was as under :- 2. Thus in view of the aforesaid fact that the value of clearances exceeded Rs. 20 Lakhs during each of the above financial years, the petitioner was not eligible for exemption from payment of excise...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Champa Srivastava vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: P Basu, U Verma
08 April, 1992·2. A counter-affidavit was called for in response to which the State has come out with an affidavit of one Shiv Mohan Lal Srivastava, Tehsildar, tehsil-Sadar district Mirzapur. The petitioner has filed a rejoinder-affidavit. 3. Sri G.N. Chandra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Shivji Misr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Vimlesh W/O Sri Prakash Chand ... vs Sri Prakash Chand Sharma S/O Ram ...
Judges: B Yadav
07 April, 1992·11. In Blyth v. Blyth (1966-1 All ER 524 at p. 536) it was held that when the issue is one of 'cruelty', the test to apply is whether on a preponderance of probabilities the relevant fact is proved. In civil cases, this, normally, is the standard of proof to apply for finding whether the burden of p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.