Puran Sugar Works vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: B J Reddy, R Sharma
11 July, 1990·1. Having heard counsel for both the parties, wn direct the Tribunal to state the following two questions, namely, questions Nos. 1 and 2, out of the questions suggested by the assessee under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 : "(1) Whether the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Girraj Kishore Kanhaiya Lal vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: B J Reddy, R Sharma
11 July, 1990·"(1) Whether the Tribunal was justified in law in treating a sum of Rs. 35,000 as the assessee's income which was a deposit given by Sri Shaukat Ali to the assessee ? (2) Whether the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the discrepancy of Rs. 1,00,000 in the balance-sheet representing exces...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sital Prasad vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: B J Reddy, R Sharma
11 July, 1990·"1. Whether the Tribunal was legally correct in holding that the first appellate authority was justified in dismissing the assessee's appeal and no interference was called for ? 2. Whether the order of the Tribunal in its entirety is not vitiated in law as having been passed without considering the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Swadeshi Cotton Mills vs Labour Court (1) And Ors.
Judges: R Dhavan
11 July, 1990·2. The petition was filed on 23rd November, 1984 and was admitted on 1st January, 1985 when notices were issued on the stay application and ad interim order was not granted against the award dated 5th June 1984 in Adjudication Case No. 90 of 1983 Annexure 6 to the petition. The issue in the award wa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dev Kumar Jain vs Agricultural Valuation ...
Judges: B J Reddy, R Sharma
10 July, 1990·3. The assessment year concerned herein is 1980-81. The relevant valuation date is March 31, 1980. Before the Wealth-tax Officer, two of the issues in controversy were : (i) whether, the family settlement put forward by the assessee is true and should be accepted, and (ii) what is the value of the a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bidhi Chand Kanhaiya Lal vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: B J Reddy, R Sharma
10 July, 1990·"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in view of the time limit prescribed under Section 153(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for completing the assessments, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in law in upholding the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) direct...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Rajendra Kumar Karanwal
Judges: B J Reddy, R Sharma
10 July, 1990·1. By this application under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the applicant is asking this court to refer the following two questions : "(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was legally correct in holding that the initiation of ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs J.K. Organisation
Judges: B J Reddy, R Sharma
10 July, 1990·"1. Whether the Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that the income of the assessee association of persons was exempt from tax on the ground of mutuality despite the position that the provisions of Section 10(24) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, were not applicable to the facts of this case beca...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Textile Agents vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: B J Reddy, R Sharma
10 July, 1990·2. Whether the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in its presumption that the loose papers found in the residential premises of a partner, belonged to the applicant-firm and the initial burden is on the applicant-firm to disprove the contents of the said loose papers ? 3. Whether the findin...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandpur Sugar Co. Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: B J Reddy, R Sharma
10 July, 1990·"(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally correct in holding that the expenditure of Rs. 2,16,264 for the direct feeder line of power not owned by the assessee-company was a capital expenditure ? (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.