Haji Ismail And Co. vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax And ...
Judges: K Agrawal, R Gulati
31 July, 1989·1. Haji Ismail and Company has preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking certiorari for quashing of the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax, Allahabad, dated October 14, 1987, passed under Section 273A of the Income-tax Act. 2. The assessee (petitioner) voluntari...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Barnwal Abhushan Kendra vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax And ...
Judges: K Agrawal, R Gulati
31 July, 1989·2. For the assessment year 1980-81, the petitioner did not submit the return within time. It was submitted by it voluntarily before initiation of the proceedings under Section 139(2) or 148 of the Income-tax Act. After imposition of interest and penalty, the petitioner applied for waiver of the same...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dr. Shakeel Ahmad vs Smt. Sabina Khatoon
Judges: D Sinha
28 July, 1989·1. Heard Sri C. B. Yadav, holding brief of Sri R. H. Zaidi, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. In Suit No. 107 of 1984, wherein the opposite party and the applicant figure as plaintiff and defendant respectively, 4th May, 1987iwas fixed for final hearing. The opposite party failed to appear. Cons...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P. And Another vs District Judge, Meerut And ...
Judges: B Yadav
27 July, 1989·3. The District Judge in both these petitions, by taking an erroneous view of the definition of 'vacant land' under S. 2(q)(i)(ii) of the Act, allowed the appeal and modified the order of the trial court by holding in the first petition that an area of 14170 sq mtrs. only was surplus land, whereas i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Chaman Lal Mahendra Prakash
Judges: K Agrawal, R Gulati
27 July, 1989·"(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally correct in holding that the partnership between the karta of the Hindu undivided family and the coparcener was a valid partnership ? (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Gopi M. Puri vs Collector Of C. Ex.
Judges: K Agrawal, R Gulati
27 July, 1989·3. At the admission stage two separate counter-affidavits have been filed on behalf of the respondents No. 1 and 2. 4. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 5. In the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of respondent No. 2 no attempt has been made to justify the seizure. The relief claime...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdul Hafeez Khan vs Superintendent Of Central Excise
Judges: K Agarwal, R Gulati
26 July, 1989·(i) DD-2 No. 152747 dated 23-5-1968, amount Rs. 2,941.20 (ii) DD-2 No. 153252 dated 30-9-1970, amount Rs. 2,679.40 (iii) DD-2 No. 153253 dated 20-9-1970, amount Rs. 3,006.20 The total amount demanded from the petitioner was Rs. 8,626.80 plus 10 per cent collection charges. 2. The petitioner's observ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Narain Pasi And Ors. vs State Of U.P.
Judges: A Varma, G Malviya
26 July, 1989·(iii) The Senior Superintendent of Police shall ensure that these safeguards are duly carried out by the police. 3. The relevant facts are that the applicants are accused in Crime No. 14 of 1989 under Section 302, I.P.C. The incident is said to have taken place on 9-1-1989. An F.I.R. was lodged in c...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhatia Metal Containers (Pvt.) ... vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: S Agarwala, R Misra
25 July, 1989·2. Section 2(n) of the Factories Act, 1948 defines an 'occupier'. It reads as under: "2(n). "Occupier" of a factory means the person who has ultimate control over the affairs of the factory." Proviso (ii) to Sub-section (n) of Section 2 of the Act is relevant for the purposes of this Act. It reads a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gopi Krishna Agarwal vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr.
Judges: K Agarwal, R Gulati
25 July, 1989·1. We have heard Sri. A.P. Mathur, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri N.B. Singh for the Union of India. The petitioner is entitled to the release of goods seized from his custody in view of the orders dated 22.12.1987 and 24.12.1987 passed by the Assistant Collector. In compliance of these ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.