Shervani Sugar Syndicate Ltd. vs Income-Tax Officer.
Judges:
14 December, 1989·Income Tax Act 1961 s. 145 ORDER ON MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION Per Shri Y. Upadhyay, V. P. - The assessee has moved a misc. application against the order of the Tribunal in ITA Nos. 596 (All.) of 1983 and 844 (All.) of 1983. 2. The assessee referring to paragraphs 18, 19 and 20 of the order has indic...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Oriental Fire And General ... vs Smt. Shakuntala Devi
Judges: N Mithal, G Dube
13 December, 1989·8. The relevant portion of S. 95 of the Act, to which or attention was drawn, reads as under: "95. Requirements of Policies and Limits of Liability.-- (1) In order to comply with the requirements of this Chapter, a policy of insurance must be a policy which - (a) is issued by a person who is an auth...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
D.S. Central Railway vs Mohd. Ishaq
Judges: R Misra
12 December, 1989·1. Mohd, Ishaq, respondent, was at the material time a workman employed by the D.S. Central Railway, Jhansi and on 29.8.73 received personal injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment and his left leg heel was fractured. On these facts there is no dispute. The claimant, ho...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ganesh Babo Gupta vs State Of U.P.
Judges: S Jafri
11 December, 1989·4. As soon as fraud trickled to the notice of U. P. Financial Corporation, a report of the offence was made by Sri S. K. Srivastava, Deputy Chief Law Manager on 20-4-89 at 4.30 p.m. at P. S. Gwaltoli Kanpur Nagar and on the basis of the aforesaid report, a Chik Report was prepared and a case Under S...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
S.N. Steel Corporation vs Dany Dairy And Food Engineers Ltd.
Judges: A Misra
07 December, 1989·2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. The main ground on which this petition is moved is that the company is unable to pay its debts as specified under Section 433(e) of the Act and, therefore, the company is liable to be wound up. The main contention for coming to that conclusion is b...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Collector vs Decent Dyeing Co.
Judges: K Agarwal, R Gulati
07 December, 1989·(i) DD-2 No. 152747 dated 23-5-1968, amount Rs. 2,941.20 (ii) DD-2 No. 153252 dated 30-9-1970, amount Rs. 2,679.40 (iii) DD-2 No. 153253 dated 20-9-1970, amount Rs. 3,006.20 The total amount demanded from the petitioner was Rs. 8,626.80 plus 10 per cent collection charges. 2. The petitioner's observ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dharmvir And Ors. vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: P Basu
07 December, 1989·3. Firstly, that other witnesses namely, Tufail, Maqsood, Baburam, Idris, Yaseen and Dharmvir though mentioned by the complainant as witnesses of the occurrence have not been examined under Section 202, Cr. P.C. 4. Secondly, the statement of the doctor namely PW 6 Doctor Lok Nath Deepak does not ind...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Saran Tripathi vs Chancellor, Gorakhpur ...
Judges: O Prakash
02 December, 1989·that Dean Faculty of Arts, Gorakhpur University is a Senior Professor under S. 27(4) and an officer of the University under S. 9 of the Act and as such Shri Banerji should have been treated as an expert member nominated by the Vice-Chancellor..... that in view of the aforesaid facts the Dean Faculty...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Devi Bux Singh vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Anr.
Judges: S Ahmad, S Sahay
02 December, 1989·6. We have also summoned the record of case Crime No. 23 of 1989 and Criminal Case No. 800 of 1989 arising out of the case Crime No. 148 of 1988 and have perused the same, 7. The indisputed facts are that the petitioners Devi Bux Singh and Arjun Singh and 11 others are accused in case crime No. 148 ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.