Commissioner Of Sales Tax vs Tin Manufacturing Co. Of India
Judges: A Singh
11 April, 1989·1. This revision at the instance of Commissioner of Sales Tax, U.P., is directed against the judgment dated 18.2.1987 passed by the Sales Tax Tribunal relating to the assessment year 1980-81. 2. The assessee is a manufacturer of tin containers carrying on its business at Mohan Nagar, Ghaziabad. In d...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Benarsi Das And Sons vs Commissioner Of Sales Tax
Judges: A Singh
11 April, 1989·1. This revision under Section 11 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) at the instance of assessee is directed against the judgment dated 24.6.1987 passed by Sales Tax Tribunal relating to assessment year 1978-79. 2. Assessee is a registered dealer under the U.P. Sales Tax ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mewa Ram Arun And Anr. vs The State
Judges: S Jafri
07 April, 1989·JUDGMENT S.I. Jafri, J. 1. The instant appeal has been filed by Mewa Ram Arun and Ram Naresh challenging their conviction under Section 161 I.P.C. and Section 342 IPC(?) and further under Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentence of two years' R.I. one year's R.I. and two years' ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Satyadeo Singh vs Vidyawati And Ors.
Judges: N Mithal
05 April, 1989·3. The rest in this chapter is not quite relevant except to the extent that such claims require expeditious disposal on a priority basis and in doing so neither proof of negligence of the driver nor any contributory negligence of the victims have to be considered. Section 92-E, gives an overriding e...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajiv Kumar Singh vs Lucknow University Through Its ...
Judges: S Ahmad, V Kumar
04 April, 1989·(i) He must hold a Master's Degree in the subject concerned and (ii) Possess such "additional qualifications" as may be laid down by the Board of Faculties concerned. 6. It is in respect of "additional qualifications" that a transitory provision has been made which provides that Until the Board of F...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Brindawan Choubey vs Smt. Ram Sanwari
Judges: P Basu
04 April, 1989·2. The facts are that on 17-6-1981 an application under Section 125, Cr. P.C. was moved by Smt. Ram Sanwari against the applicant on whom the summons were directed to issue. It appears that the applicant had. by then gone to the United States of America, regarding his employment. A letter by the Mag...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Wimco Limited vs Union Of India (Uoi)
Judges: R Sahai, R Gulati
03 April, 1989·1. The only question that arises for consideration in this petition is if the claim of refund of excise duty paid by petitioner on certain goods which were exempted under notification was within time. 2. Although facts are undisputed yet it is necessary to narrate them in brief in order to appreciat...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bachan Lal vs Dt. Asst. Registrar Of Co-Op. ...
Judges: U Srivastava, S Raza
03 April, 1989·1. By means of this petition the petitioner, who was a Sachiv in a Co-operative Society, has challenged the order of termination of his services, dated August 17, 1983. As provided, a selection was held in accordance with the relevant rules and the petitioner was appointed as Sachiv on a clear vacan...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sunera And Ors. vs Sukhi Ram And Ors.
Judges: K Agarwal
03 April, 1989·1. This appeal under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act has been filed by the heirs and legal representatives of the deceased Heti against the judgment and order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mathura, rejecting their claim petition under Section 110-A of the Act. 2. The claim of the ap...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.