Ajai Kumar And Co. vs Commissioner Of Sales Tax
Judges: S Dhaon
30 September, 1985·1. These revisions, at the instance of the assessee, arise out of the same order dated 21st February, 1985, passed by the Sales Tax Tribunal, U.P. (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal). 2. Proceedings were initiated against the petitioner-company, which runs a brick-kiln, for the assessment year...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gupta Cycle Stores vs Commissioner, Sales Tax
Judges: S Dhaon
30 September, 1985·1. This is assessee's revision. It is directed against an order dated 12th March, 1985, passed by the U.P. Sales Tax Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal). 2. According to the order the assessee was absent at the time when the appeal was called out for hearing in spite of due service. A...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dilip Singh Yadav vs The Pracharya And Adhikshak, Sri ...
Judges: K Agarwal, A Srivastava
27 September, 1985·2. B.A.M.S. course entitles a candidate for admission in the Ayurvedic Colleges, the details of which are mentioned in l(iv) to the General Instructions, B.U.M.S. course is in Unani. 3. For appearing in M.B.N.S., B.D.S. and B.H.M.S., the applicants must have the following course group - of qualifyin...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Shakuntala Devi And Ors. vs Amir Hasan And Ors.
Judges: S Agarwala
27 September, 1985·(b) withdraw any suit, appeal or other proceeding pending in any Court subordinate to it and (i) try or dispose of the same; or (ii) transfer the same for trial or disposal to any Court subordinate to it and competent to try or dispose of the same; or (iii) retransfer the same for trial or disposal ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shiv Prasad Lal vs Chairman, U.P. State Electricity ...
Judges: O Prakash
25 September, 1985·2. Aggrieved, the claimant has filed the instant appeal from the order of the Tribunal. 1 have heard Sri Janardan Sahai learned Counsel for the claimant, Sri A.P. Singh learned Counsel for the respondents, (first set) and Sri S.N. Verma, learned Counsel for the respondent (second set). The submissio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Sushila Devi vs Om Prakash And Ors.
Judges: O Prakash
24 September, 1985·2. In the said petition, the applicant contended that the testator, namely, Smt. Jiwani Devi executed a will dt. 12-1-1965 in favour of her and her two more sisters, namely, Smt. Viddyawati and Smt. Bala Sundri. One Sri Ved Prakash who is the son of Smt. Viddyawati, filed a written statement stating...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Babban (Deceased By L.R'S.) vs Shiv Nath And Ors.
Judges: N Sharma
23 September, 1985·6. Aggrieved by this decision defendant has filed this appeal. 7. On behalf of the appellant Sri Swaraj Prakash, argued that lower appellate Court wrongly observed that after admission of his signatures on pronote and receipt in question burden lay on defendant to move that these were obtained under...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jagdish (Deceased By L.R'S.) And ... vs Mangal Pandey (Deceased By ...
Judges: N Mithal
23 September, 1985·5. In the General Clauses Act, 1897, "immoveable property" has been defined in Section 3(26) as under : -- "Immoveable property" shall include land, benefits to arise out of land, and things attached to the earth, or permanently fastened to any thing attached to the earth". Under Sub-clause (36), th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dhampur Sugar Mills Limited vs Collector Of Central Excise And ...
Judges: K Agrawal, A Srivastava
23 September, 1985·1. M/s. Dhampur Sugar Mills Ltd., Bijnor, has filed this writ petition for mandamus directing respondents Nos. 1, 2 and 3 to refund the sum of Rs. 79,493.97. 2. It appears that the petitioner-company was called upon by notices dated 9th May, 1983 and 16th May, 1983 to show cause why they should not ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bakhtawar Lal And Ors. vs Ram Kumar And Ors.
Judges: K Agarwal, A Misra
20 September, 1985·6. Whether the award is arbitrary? 5. Learned Civil Judge decided the aforesaid issues in favour of Respondent 6 and other respondents supporting her. He held that the arbitrator had heard the appellant behind the back of the respondents, and that he did not inform those respondents about its hearin...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.