Qureshi Crucible Centre vs Commissioner Of Sales Tax
Judges: A Singh
21 February, 1985·1. The assessee has preferred this revision against the order dated 31st May, 1985, passed by the Sales Tax Tribunal, Moradabad, relating to the assessment year 1975-76. 2. The assessee deals in crucibles. The account books of the assessee were rejected and best judgment assessment was passed. It is...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bijai Bahadur And Ors. vs Shri Shiv Kumar And Anr.
Judges: N Mithal
21 February, 1985·(ii) the plaintiff must aver performance of, or readiness and willingness to perform the contract according to its true construction." 6. A reading of the section shows that a decree for specific performance cannot be granted to any one who fails to aver and prove that either he had performed or had...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
New India Assurance Co. And Anr. vs Udai Narain Gupta And Anr.
Judges: A Verma
21 February, 1985·4. Sri R.C. Rao filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act and claimed compensation amounting to Rs. 42,250/-. In the petition it was asserted that the accident was caused by the rash and negligent act of the driver of the bus, as a consequence of which he sustained the injuries mentioned a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Sales Tax vs Raj And Co.
Judges: O Prakash
20 February, 1985·Roshan shital tail varshon ki athak parishratn avam pahari jari butyun se tayyar kiya gaya hai-yeh tel dimagi kamjori balon ka girna va safed hona adi men labh kari hai tatha mastisk ko shitalta pardan karta hai. 3. Considering this description, the A. C. (J) took the view that the product, namely, ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
National Insurance Co. vs Dulari Devi And Anr.
Judges: A Varma
20 February, 1985·3. For the insurance company, learned counsel submitted that the Tribunal has committed two mistakes : (1) it wrongly allowed the insurance company to be impleaded in the claim petition after the expiry of one year, and (2) the Tribunal has wrongly assessed the damages claimed by the respondents at ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raj Kumar vs The Licencing Authority, ...
Judges: O Saxena, B Yadav
19 February, 1985·2. The facts shorn of details leading to the present petition art: that the petitioner was the bhumidhar of plot No. 49, area 1.12 acres, plot No. 31, area Order44 acre, plot No. 47A, area Order 81 acre and plot No. 47-B, area 4.61 acres. The petitioner's father was entered as bhumidhar. The petitio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Faqir Chand Panna Lal vs Commissioner Of Sales Tax
Judges: A Singh
18 February, 1985·1. The assessee has preferred this revision against the judgment passed by the Sales Tax Tribunal, Bench II, Aligarh, dated 20th June, 1984, relating to assessment year 1977-78 dismissing its appeal. 2. The short question involved in the instant revision is that the appeal of the assessee has been r...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Maharaja Dharmendra Pratap ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh
Judges: A Singh
18 February, 1985·1. This is a reference under Section 24 of the U.P. Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1948. The following questions have been referred for the opinion of this court : "1. Whether the sale of timber from the planted groves prior to the introduction of Section 6A in the Agricultural Income-tax Act was liab...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Oswal Vanaspati And Allied ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh
Judges: B N Katju, M Wahajuddin, S Mukherjee
15 February, 1985·(i) Whether in view of the substantive sentence provided under Section 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, while the company is a juristic person cannot suffer substantive sentence, section 17(1)(b) is rendered nullified and the company cannot be prosecuted under the Prevention of F...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhanwar Singh vs Raghubir Nanwa Singh And Ors.
Judges: N Sharma
15 February, 1985·the agreement was duly executed and no fraud was practised on the defendants; the suit was not barred by Section 168-A of U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act; Section 154 of aforesaid Act did not operate as a bar in allowing the claim of plaintiff. It was also found that plaintiff was entitled to recover Rs. 7800...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.