Income-Tax Officer vs Jangi Lal.
Judges:
29 August, 1983·4. Shri Jangi Lal as an individual filed an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) challenging the levy of the above penalty. A preliminary objection was raised on his behalf before the Commissioner (Appeals) to the effect that although he had been subjected to a penalty under section 271(1)(a) ye...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dr. Iqbal Hasan Khan vs Iiird Additional District Judge ...
Judges: S Agarwala
29 August, 1983·4. This suit was filed under Order 1. Rule 8, CPC as a representative suit on behalf of the entire body of the members of the Aligarh Muslim University Old Boys Association (hereinafter referred to as the Association). The membership was alleged to be 1000 in number. After the filing of the suit, an...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The State vs K.P. Jain And Etc.
Judges: R Misra
24 August, 1983·2. The fact that Sri S. P. Jain was Chairman and K. P. Jain was Managing Director of Aligarh Electric Supply Company Ltd. is proved from the deposition of Sri Shyam Sunder Saxena (P. W. 1) and goes unchallenged by the defence. 3. The fact that Sri K. S. Kohli was appointed Receiver of the aforesaid ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ambrish Kumar Sahu vs U.P. Financial Corporation And ...
Judges: N Ojha, I Singh
19 August, 1983·1. One Sahu Bishwanath Singh, who was the father of the plaintiff-appellant, took a loan of Rs. 50,000/- from the U. P. Financial Corporation on 14th April, 1966, and executed a mortgage deed of certain properties as security for the loan. The amount of loan does not appear to have been paid by Sahu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Universal Exporters vs State Of U.P.
Judges: H Seth, R Sahai, V Mehrotra
19 August, 1983·14. Bias was raised more emotionally than factually. It was under legal misapprehension. 15. Before closing it may be mentioned that although in the order dated 3rd February forms were refused because purchases were for export but in the counter-affidavit to supplementary affidavit U. P. and inter-S...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Income-Tax Officer vs Mangal Pd. Gupta.
Judges:
17 August, 1983·(iii) that there could be no savings from household as the withdrawals made by the assessee for domestic expenses were only the following : 1976-77 Rs. 2,250 1977-78 Rs. 3,679 1978-79 Rs. 3,591 (iv) that in the account books of the firm Gupta & Co. (assessee is a 60 per cent partner therein) a sum o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jeet Singh And Ors. vs The State
Judges: A Srivastava
17 August, 1983·3. On 24-5-1977 the Sessions Judge fixed 19-7-1977 for hearing of the appeal and as provided in Section 385(1)(i), Cr. P. C. directed this date of hearing to be notified not only to the appellant No. 1 but to his counsel also. The order of the Sessions Judge dated 24-5-1977 did not further call upon...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sudershan Prasad Jain And Ors. vs Nem Chandra Jain And Anr.
Judges: M Wahajuddin
16 August, 1983·(i) D. B. State v. Bansu. (ii) 1968 All WR (HC) 703, Laxami Narain v. Abdul Karim single Judge. (iii) 1979 Cri LJ 41(SC) Ratilal Bhanji v. State of Maharashtra. (iv) AIR 1948 All 135: 49 Cri LJ 101 Swaroop Singh v. Emperor single Judge. 2. In all these cases discharge in a warrant case has not been ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Allahabad Patrika Pvt. Ltd. vs Labour Court And Ors.
Judges: A Varma
09 August, 1983·2. Learned Counsel contends that the aforesaid order is manifestly unsustainable in law, inasmuch as, under Rule 12(1)(e) of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1957, the Labour Court is expressly empowered to allow an amendment of die written statement at any stage of the proceedings where it conside...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hindustan Chamber Of Commerce vs Income-Tax Officer.
Judges:
09 August, 1983·The learned Commissioner (Appeals), on a perusal of the memorandum of association of the assessee-company, took the view that none of the objects entitled the assessee to run a weighbridge to earn income therefrom. The learned Commissioner (Appeals) observed that the assessee had not furnished any i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.