Omega Sports & Radio Works vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: C Singh, R Rastogi
18 November, 1981·4. Since this question was highly contentious, recourse to Section154 of the Act was not justifiable. 5. Now, at the instance of the assessee, the Appellate Tribunal has referred the following question of law to this court. " Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal w...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
U.P. State Electricity Board And ... vs Jhagreshwar Prasad And Anr.
Judges: V Mehrotra
18 November, 1981·It later observed that: In Shri Ambica Mills Co. Ltd. v. S.A. Bhatt 1961-I L.L.J. 1, Section 15 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (No. 4 of 1936) fell to be construed, and it was held that under the said section, when the authority exercises its jurisdiction which is made exclusive by Section 22, it...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pera Khatika And Anr. vs Lal Behari And Anr.
Judges: V Mehrotra
18 November, 1981·(1) Whether the plaintiff was the owner of the house in suit? (2) Whether the sale certificate obtained by the plaintiff was legal and the plaintiff derived title therefrom? (3) Whether the plaintiff took possession through court on June 3, 1965 and entered into possession on that date? (4) Whether ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Khelawan Misra vs State Of U.P. And Anr.
Judges: A Banerji
17 November, 1981·5. In the present case, the petitioner has asked for a licence for a rifle. He was, therefore, required to show a good reason for obtaining the same. Section 14 of the Act lays down the grounds for refusal of the licence. Section 14 of the Act reads as follows:-- "14. Refusal of licences.--(1) Notwi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rashid And Ors. vs Mst. Batulan Bibi And Ors.
Judges: S Hyder
16 November, 1981·3. The facts of the case lie in a narrow ambit. One Kadir left behind five sons including the plaintiff-appellants Rashid and Majid. Hamid was the third son who died issuless leaving behind a widow Smt. Batulan, who was impleaded as defendant 1. Mukhtar and Umar were the remaining two sons of Kadir....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Priya Saran vs Ghan Sham Das And Anr.
Judges: D Nandan
14 November, 1981·3. The two questions raised before the lower appellate Court were; firstly; whether the agreement between the parties took place at Shankaragarh or it took place at Devendra Nagar. and whether the amounts were advanced at Shankargarh or at Naugaon and Devendranagar; and secondly whether the agreemen...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gajanand Sutwala vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: C Singh, R Rastogi
13 November, 1981·2. The assessee is an HUF and derives income from various sources including share income from firms. In the assessment year 1964-65 with which we are concerned in the present reference, it filed a return in which it disclosed the extent of its interest in two firms, M/s. Hanuman Dass Kasari Prasad, ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P. vs Prescribed Authority, Kiccha ...
Judges: K Singh
13 November, 1981·6. In reply, the learned counsel for the opposite parties hag submitted that the appellate authority has correctly taken into account the Government Order in excluding the land sold by the tenure-holder before 24-1-1971. The learned counsel for the opposite party has placed reliance upon the ruling ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Peerzada Ahmad Saleem Khan vs Vice-Chancellor, Aligarh Muslim ...
Judges: K Seth, K Agarwal
13 November, 1981·He was called upon to submit his reply within 48 hours of its receipt. 3. On 22nd July, 1981, the petitioner wrote a letter to the Vice-Chancellor requesting him to supply the copies of the reports mentioned in the charge-sheet. The petitioner also made a prayer for postponement of the case. He aske...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Qudrat Ullah vs Mohammad Yasin And Ors.
Judges: D Nandan
12 November, 1981·4. To what relief, if any, is the plaintiff entitled? On the first issue the trial court held that the plaintiff is not a co-sharer in the house in suit, on issue no. 2, that the plaintiff did not make any demand for pre-emption; on issue No. 3, that the suit was barred by estoppel, and on issue No....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.