Johari vs Mahendra Singh And Anr.
Judges: N Mithal
26 August, 1981·1. This is a defendant's revision. The plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of the contract of sale but failed to get a decree in the trial court. While the appeal was pending in the lower appellate court, the plaintiff made an application for amendment of the plaint introducing the claim...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hira Lal Jain And Co. vs The Sales Tax Officer 12 And Anr.
Judges: C Singh, M Mehrotra
26 August, 1981·6. (b) In Sub-section (2), before the words 'compounding of offences', the words 'charging or payment of interest,' shall be inserted and shall be deemed always to have been inserted. 4. Section 9(4) which purports to be a validating provision was to the following effect: 9. (4) Any interest charged...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shiv Narain Chaudhary vs Naug And Company, Allahabad
Judges: R Sahai
26 August, 1981·3. The principal question, however, is whether respondents committed any default. On this the two courts have differed. The appellate court found that after the receipt of notice the defendant within time sent the money order to the plaintiff, and, therefore, even if it did not reach the plaintiff i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Surajdeo vs Board Of Revenue, U.P., Allahabad ...
Judges: K Singh
25 August, 1981·8. The learned counsel for the petitioner deposited a court-fee of Rs. 100/-to meet the technical objection raised on behalf of the contesting opposite parties to the effect that one writ petition was not competent for the purpose of quashing two orders passed by the revisional court relating to two...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
L.H. Sugar Factories & Oil Mills P. ... vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: S Chandra, R Rastogi
25 August, 1981·" 1. Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that the provisions of Section 40(c)(i) and 40(c)(iii) are mutally exclusive and that the expenditure by way of guarantee commission paid to directors was to be considered only in the light of Section 40(c)(i) of the Act ? and 2. Whether on the facts an...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
R.G. Paper And Straw Board And Anr. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: S Chandra, R Rastogi
25 August, 1981·Having regard to the above facts and circumstances of the case the board manufactured by the appellant has rightly been classified by the adjudicating officer as 'other boards' and does not attract the benefit of notification No 35/64 dated 1-3-64 as amended from time to time. The order appealed aga...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kaiser Parvez And Etc. vs Abdul Majid And Ors.
Judges: S Hyder
25 August, 1981·4. In his written statement, Mohammad Yasin supported the case of the plaintiffs-appellants. On the other hand the contesting defendants-respondents filed a joint written statement in the two suits. They traversed the allegations made by the plaintiffs in the suit and raised a number of pleas in the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajendra Swarup Sharma vs Delhi Transport Undertaking
Judges: K Singh, B Sapru
18 August, 1981·1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Meerut, dated March 19, 1975, dismissing the appellant's claim petition filed under Section 110A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. 2. Rajendra Swarup Sharma, appellant, received multiple injuries in the accident t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hakim Singh vs District Judge And Ors.
Judges: M Mehrotra
18 August, 1981·3. Now the petitioner has come up in the instant petition and in support thereof, I have heard Sri. Tejpal, learned counsel for the petitioner. It may be stated here that subsequently during the pendency of the petition an application was made in Sep. 1980 praying as follows:-- "It is, therefore, pr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Union Of India (Uoi) vs Vinod Prakash Singh And Ors.
Judges: K Singh, B Sapru
18 August, 1981·9. Against the order of the Ad hoc Claims Commissioner the Union of India has preferred the present appeal, 10. The first submission of Sri Lalji Sinha appearing on behalf of the petitioner is that the Ad hoc Claims Commissioner had no jurisdiction to review its order. Section 82A of the Railways Ac...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.