In Re: Lakshmi Industries And Cold ... vs Unknown
Judges: C Singh, R Rastogi
15 April, 1980·JUDGMENT C.S.P. Singh, J. 1. This is an application for recalling our order dated 18th October, 1979 Addl. CIT v. Lakshmi Industries & Cold Storage Co. [1980] 122 ITR 993 (All) by which we had answered the reference made at the instance of the Commissioner in favour of the Commissioner. It appears t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Ratan Misra And Anr. vs Smt. Bittan Kaur
Judges: A Banerji
15 April, 1980·3. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties I am satisfied that there has been a miscarriage of justice in this case. Section 68 of the Evidence Act is mandatory. It reads.:-- "68. Proof of execution of document required by law to be attested -- If a document is required by law to be atteste...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Firm Jaimni Dass And Sons And Ors. vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors.
Judges: S Chandra, Y Nandan
14 April, 1980·(i) the doctrine of promissory estoppel invalidates this Act; (ii) the Act violates Article 19(1)(f) and (g) of the Constitution; (iii) the amending Act was confiscatory in nature and so violates Article 31 of the Constitution. 6. In our opinion the doctrine of promissory estoppel has no application...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kapoor Chand Jain vs District Judge, Mathura And Ors.
Judges: S Chandra, K Seth, K Agarwal
14 April, 1980·(a) thirtieth day of June following the date of transfer, or (b) from the date of allotment to him of any residential accommodation either under the Act or any official accommodation by the employer, whichever is later. 5. This provision came up for consideration in Deep Chandra's case (1978 All Ren...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Fatmabibi vs Smt. Irfana Begam And Ors.
Judges: D Nandan
11 April, 1980·3. It is not necessary to refer to the whole case of the parties or their pleadings. Issue No. 8 raised the question whether the gift deed dated 1st April, 1914 relied upon by the defendants Nos. 1 to 3 is void and illegal for the reasons set forth in paragraph 12 of the plaint. 4. Paragraph 12 of t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Ram Niwas Agrawal
Judges: S Chandra, H Seth
11 April, 1980·" Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, was the Tribunal justified in cancelling the penalty imposed on the assessee for the assessment year 1962-63 ? " 2. The Tribunal has accordingly stated the case for our opinion. 3. It appears that in the course of assessment proceedings f...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Indodan Milk Products vs State Of U.P.
Judges: S Chandra, Y Nandan
11 April, 1980·(a) the sales of water (other than mineral water, aerated water, tonic water, distilled water or scented water), milk (other than condensed milk, milk powder or baby milk), salt, newspapers, motor spirit or any other goods which the State Government may, by notification in the official Gazette, exem...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Gift Tax vs Jagannath Prasad Pandey.
Judges:
10 April, 1980·3. The Revenue felt aggrieved and went up in appeal to the Tribunal. The Tribunal held that the agricultural land being ancestral belongs to the HUF. A Karta could not validly gift coparcenary property in favour of the coparceners, as it would be making a gift to ones own self. In other words, it wa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M.P. Rais vs Controller Of Estate Duty
Judges: S Chandra, H Seth
10 April, 1980·" Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in including a sum of Rs. 8,000 representing the value of jewellery owned and possessed by the deceased in its estate under the Estate Duty Act, 1953 ? " 2. Srimati Kasturi Devi, who was an income-tax and wealth-t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Aziz Fatima vs Munshi Khan
Judges: K Agarwal
09 April, 1980·4. The expression "cause of action means the "cause of action" for which the suit was brought. In order that the "cause of action" in two suits could be the same, it was necessary that the facts which entitled the plaintiff to the right claimed must not only be the same, but also that the infringeme...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.