Tahsildar And Anr. vs Shyam Lal And Ors.
Judges: D Chandrashekhar, H Swarup
25 February, 1977·1. This appeal has been filed against the judgment of the learned single Judge by which he allowed the writ petition filed by the present respondents against the order of the Tahsildar, directing initiation of proceedings to take possession of the plots in dispute in exercise of the powers under Rul...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Beni Prasad vs State Of Uttar Pradesh
Judges: H Kapoor
23 February, 1977·3. Therefore, the only point that arises for decision is whether the Assistant Collector acting Under Section 134 of the U. P. Z. A. and L. R. Act acts as a court. Under Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act, court is defined as follows :-- Court includes all Judges and Magistrates and all persons, e...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gulab Chitra Mandir, Mahoba vs Municipal Board, Mahoba & Ors.
Judges:
23 February, 1977·2. Counsel for the petitioner has urged that the imposition of tax is bad as no sanction was obtained by the prescribed authority as contemplated under S. 133(I) of the U.P. Municipalities Act. This point was not taken specifically in the Writ Petition except for a vague allegation that the procedur...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kanpur Salt Refinery vs State Of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
Judges:
22 February, 1977·JUDGMENT R. M. Sahai, J. - This writ petition is directed against a notice dated 25th September 1976 directing the Petitioner to deposit tax on Kala Namak for the first quarter of 1976-77. He was further intimated that in case he failed to deposit the tax proceeding shall be taken against him and th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kanpur Salt Refinery vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh And Anr.
Judges: D Chandrashekhar, R Sahai
22 February, 1977·1. This writ petition is directed against a notice dated 25th September, 1976, directing the petitioner to deposit tax on kala namak for the first quarter of 1976-77. He was further intimated that in case he failed to deposit the tax, proceeding shall be taken against him and the quarterly return sh...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Maqsood Mohammad vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh And Anr.
Judges: D Chandrashekhar, R Sahai
22 February, 1977·7. The learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents raised a preliminary objection that these petitions are not maintainable in view of Clause (3) of new Article 226 of the Constitution (substituted by the Forty second Amendment to the Constitution), since the petitioners have alternative ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S. Maqsood Mohammad vs State Of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
Judges:
22 February, 1977·(1) sodium chloride percent by weight ......... 98.3 (ii) total sulphides as sodium sulphides as per cent by weight .... o.44." The question that arises for determination in these petitions, is whether of not Kala Namak can be regarded as salt which is exempt from sales tax under S. 4 of the Act. 6....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jan Daood And Co vs Income-Tax Officer, B-Ward, ...
Judges:
18 February, 1977·Shri Jindal contended that in the circumstances the petitioner must be regarded as having filed the declaration for continuation of the firm within the time limit provided by clause (ii) to the proviso of section 184(7) of the Act and that even if such declaration for continuation of the registratio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jan Daood And Co. vs Income-Tax Officer, B-Ward And ...
Judges: D Chandrashekhar, R Sahai
18 February, 1977·7. Shri Jindal contended that in the circumstances the petitioner must be regarded as having filed the declaration for continuation of registration of the firm within the time limit provided by Clause (ii) to the proviso of Section 184(7) of the Act and that even if such declaration for continuation...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Shushma Giri And Ors. vs The 9Th Addl. Dist. Judge, ...
Judges: K Singh, N Ojha
17 February, 1977·2. In support of the aforesaid plea reliance has been placed on Section 18 of the Act as it stood before its amendment by U. P. Act No. 28 of 1976 and on Section 10 of the said Act. Under Section 18 of the Act as it stood before its being amended by U. P. Act No. 28 of 1976, an appeal lay to the Dis...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.