Pooran Singh S/O Of Sunder Singh, ... vs The Town Area Committee, ...
Judges:
31 October, 1976·"After the rules have been framed by the State Government a copy thereof shall be forwarded to the prescribed authority or if none is appointed the District Magistrate and the committee and then the committee shall, as soon as may be, by a resolution direct the imposition of the tax with effect from...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Adhin vs Shyama Devi And Ors.
Judges: G Srivastava
27 October, 1976·2. Coming now to the main point which has been raised in this petition, it may be necessary to reproduce the relevant provision of law, namely, Section 146(1) Cr.P.C. which runs as follow: (1) If the Magistrate at any time after making the order under Sub-section (1) of Section 145 considers the cas...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raj Kumar Kotwaj vs Commissioner Of Sales Tax
Judges: D Chandrashekhar, R Sahai
27 October, 1976·9. As stated earlier, the assessee moved the Additional Judge (Revisions), Sales Tax, to refer to this court the aforesaid questions of law. 10. Questions Nos. (1) and (4) relate to the competence of the revisional authority to give a finding that the two firms, namely, M/s. Raj Kumar Kotwaj, Shikoh...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kamta Prasad vs Behari Lal
Judges: S Chandra
27 October, 1976·6. The learned District Judge held that there was no sufficient cause for condoning the delay because even if the defendant's case that he was down with typhoid fever from March, 26 to April 3, 1972, be accepted, yet he had failed to explain the delay of three days namely, 3rd, 4th and 5th April, 19...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. ...
Judges: D Chandrasekhar, R Sahai
20 October, 1976·(i) Suit claim . . . 2,05,000.00 (ii) Costs awarded by the High Court . . . 529.00 (iii) Costs awarded by the trial court . . . 3,717.28 (iv) Interest from the date of suit till the date of decree . . . 15,667.00 Total . . . 2,24,913.28 Less commission . . . 4,780.77 Net amount . . . 2,20,192.51 4. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Duley Singh vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors.
Judges: C Singh, R Sahai
20 October, 1976·7. In order to appreciate these contentions, it would be necessary to extract Section 63-D of the Act. "68-D (1) Any person affected by the scheme published under Section 68-C, may, within thirty days from the date of the publication of the scheme in the Official Gazette, file objections thereto bef...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Aley Ahmad Abidi vs Dist. Inspector Of Schools, ...
Judges: D Chandrashekhar, K Seth, R Sahai
15 October, 1976·....." 5. Section 16-E of the Act prescribes the procedure of selection of teachers and the Head of an institution by its Committee of Management. 6. Section 16-F provides that there shall be a selection committee for selection of candidates for appointment as the Head of an Institution and a Select...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bans Narain Yadav vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: K Singh, Mufti
15 October, 1976·"For the government of Prisons and for the appointment of all Officers, appointed under the Act." 3. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner was that the appointment signifies posting to an office and nothing more, and as such, Rule 1135, which is actually relatable to the condition...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dullan Prasad vs Smt. Rajeshwari Bibi
Judges: R Misra
14 October, 1976·"17 (1) ..... Provided that an applicant for an order, to set aside a decree passed ex parte or for a review of judgment shall at the time of presenting his application, either deposit in the Court the amount due from him under the decree or in pursuance of the judgment, or give such security for th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Raja Mohd. Mustafa Ali Khan
Judges: C Singh, R Sahai
14 October, 1976·"Whether, upon the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the finding of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal is right in law that the assessment made pursuant to Section 34(1)(a) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, was barred by limitation ? " 2. The controversy raised in the present reference is...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.