Sardar Balbir Singh vs Atma Ram Srivastava
Judges: Trivedi, H Swarup, T Misra, P Prakash, D Jha
30 November, 1976·10. Loknath Singh v. Dwarika Singh, AIR 1931 Pat 233. 11. Sris Chandra Nandy of Kasimbazar v. Joyramdanga Coal Concern Ltd., AIR 1942 Cal 40. 12. Radhey Shyam v. Nanak Ram, 1968 All WR (HC) 490. 13. Lalji Mal v. Hulasi, (1881) ILR 3 All 660 (FB). 8. In the case of Shanker Lal v. Gangabisen, AIR 1972...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Nirmala Kanta vs Mulk Raj Kohli And Anr.
Judges: M Mehrotra
24 November, 1976·1. These are two connected revisions and they have arisen from one suit. A few facts may be noticed. The plaintiff claimed to be the owner of the property in suit. His assertion is that he purchased the property in the name of his wife, Smt Shanti Devi, defendant No. 2. After the purchase, certain a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Phool Chand Bajrang Lal And Anr. vs Income-Tax Officer, "B"-Ward And ...
Judges: D Chandrashekhar, R Sahai
24 November, 1976·10. On the other hand, the learned standing counsel contended that the above case was clearly distinguishable from the present case inasmuch as the ITO there had acted merely on a general circular issued by the Commissioner of Income-tax as to the bogus nature of transactions of certain creditors, b...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jaswant Singh vs The Cantonment Board, Meerut And ...
Judges: K Asthana, M Shukla
19 November, 1976·1. These three appeals are decided by a common judgment as the question involved in each of them is similar. 2. Each of the appellants made separate applications for sanction to the Cantonment Board, Meerut for making additional constructions in their houses standing on different Cantonment lands. T...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Daya Ram vs Chiraunji Lal And Anr.
Judges: H Kapoor
19 November, 1976·2. The learned Munsif ought not to have granted decree for possession along with the materials when the constructions were made by defendant No. 2 who sold his property to the defendant-appellant." The lower appellate court held that under the circumstances of this case notice under Section 111(g) T...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mangal Prasad And Ors. vs Krishna Kumar Maheshwari And Ors.
Judges: R Misra, J Sinha
19 November, 1976·4. Order XXI, Rule 89 (2) reads as follows: "Where a person applies under Rule 90 to set aside the sale of his immoveable property, he shall not, unless he withdraws his application, be entitled to make or prosecute an application under this Rule." 5. The expression 'to make or prosecute' occurring ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ganga Prasad Sarraf vs Smt. Sukra And Anr.
Judges: M Mehrotra
17 November, 1976·ORDER M.P. Mehrotra, J. 1. This amendment application has been moved on behalf of the plaintiff appellant under Order VI. Rule 17 C.P.C. seeking to amend the plaint. A counter-affidavit has been filed on behalf of the defendants respondents and in reply a rejoinder affidavit has been filed on behalf...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Dass And Anr. vs Debi Prasad And Anr.
Judges: J Trivedi
17 November, 1976·1. Debi Prasad and Gaya Prasad respondents filed a suit for ejectment against appellants Ram Dass and Hulasi and for recovery of arrears of rent and damages with the allegation that the disputed house originally belonged to Babu Lal and Anandi Lal under a sale deed executed in their favour on 4-8-19...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hindustan Aluminium Corporation ... vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh And Anr.
Judges: C Singh, R Sahai
17 November, 1976·4. In the first place, it is not disputed that the Commissioner of Sales Tax has already issued a circular to all the Sales Tax Officers and the Assistant Appellate Commissioners on the interpretation to be put on the notification dated 30th May, 1975 and informing them that only aluminium ingots sh...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hindustan Aluminium Corporation ... vs 1. State Of U.P. 2. Sales Tax ...
Judges:
17 November, 1976·5. The only question involved in this case is whether the aluminium items manufactured by the assessee, which we set out, fall within the description of the words "metal and alloy" used in the notification of 1973 or of the notification of 30th May, 1975. Counsel for the State has contended that the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.