Manohar Lal vs Smt. Rajeshwari Devi And Anr.
Judges: Trivedi
31 March, 1976·1. Plaintiff - appellant Manohar Lal filed a suit against the respondents for specific performance of an agreement said to have been executed by Smt Rajeshwari Devi respondent No 1 on 16-4-1967 (Ext. 14) in favour of appellant Manohar Lal promising to sell certain land for Rs. 2,000. It was alleged ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdul Rashid And Ors. vs The Regional Transport Authority ...
Judges: G Mathur, N Ojha
31 March, 1976·(ii) Su-section (3) were ofitted: ............ ...... ...... ...... ...... .. ............ ...... ...... ...... ...... .." The State Government thereafter issued a notification on March 30, 1972, in exercise of its powers conferred by Section 43-A. 3. As a result of the amending Act and the notifica...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Swadeshi Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. vs The Municipal Board, Azamgarh And ...
Judges: G Mathur, N Ojha
26 March, 1976·5. Section 133 deals with the power of the State Government or the Prescribed Authority to reject, sanction or modify the proposals. The Municipal Board, Maunath Bhanjan, not being a city board, its proposals were required to be considered by the Prescribed Authority who was the Commissioner. The fi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S. Ram Das Deokinandan Prasad, ... vs 1. The Secretary (Being Notified ...
Judges:
26 March, 1976·JUDGMENT C. S. P. Singh, J. - The petitioner has filed this petition claiming a relief for mandamus directing the Central Board of Direct Taxes to decide its representation made under section 132(11) of the Income-tax Act. A prayer has also been made that till not frame final assessment in the case ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax, ... vs M/S. Hansraj Gupta & Co. (P.) Ltd. ...
Judges:
26 March, 1976·2. The assessee is M/s. Hansraj Gupta & Co. (P) Ltd. It filed a return showing its income assessment Rs. 23,774/-. But, the Income-Tax Officer made several additions on account of (a) expenses claimed by the assessee assessment bad debts, repairs and travelling expenses (b) unexplained deposits amou...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax vs Ram Narain Agrawal
Judges: K Asthana, R Sahai
26 March, 1976·"Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the Finance Act, 1969, was not retrospective in effect and the penalties under Section 18(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, were exigible in these cases for the assessment years 1964-65, 1965-66, 196...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S. Swadeshi Cotton Mills Co. ... vs 1. The Municipal Board, Maunath ...
Judges:
26 March, 1976·9. Section 133 deals with the power of the State Government or the prescribed Authority to reject, sanction or modify the proposals. The Municipal Board, Maunath Bhanjan, not being a city board, its proposals were required to be considered by the prescribed Authority who was the Commissioner. The fi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Prabandha Samiti, T.J.P. Arya ... vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: K Asthana, J Sinha
25 March, 1976·(a) on the recommendation of the committee, or (b) on the recommendation of the Director of Education after allowing the President an opportunity to submit a written explanation against the said recommendation. (2) Upon such appointment being made the committee and all its office bearers shall stand...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Manmohan Singh vs Smt. Mahindra Kaur
Judges: B Katju
25 March, 1976·1. This is an application under Section 482, Cr. P.C., 1973. 2. The opposite party filed an application under Section 125, Cr. P.C. 1973 against the applicant dated 6-5-1974 in the court of C. J. M., Dehradun. The applicant filed his written statement on 4-6-1974. Thereafter the statements of the op...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nisar Ahmad And Ors. vs The Rent Control And Eviction ...
Judges: K Asthana, J Sinha
25 March, 1976·When the matter came up before the learned Single Judge, it appeared to him that the Supreme Court in Kanaiyalal Chandulal Monim v. Indumati T. Potdar (AIR 1958 SC 444) laid down a law which supported the contention that the provisions of the nature as are contained in Section 7-D of the U. P. (Temp...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.