B. Raghunandan Saran vs Smt. Kanta Devi And Anr.
Judges: H Swarup
27 September, 1974·4. Learned counsel for the appellant conceded that the finding that the easementary right of the plaintiff about getting light and air was not affected was a finding of fact based on evidence which could not be challenged in this appeal. His contention is that no person can be permitted to make cons...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Sales Tax vs Sunhari Lal Jain
Judges: S Chandra, K Seth
26 September, 1974·Whether, under the circumstances and on the facts of the case, hot tea is cooked food ? 2. The Additional Judge (Revisions), Sales Tax, held tea as cooked food relying on the decision of Commissioner of Sales Tax, M. P. v. India Coffee Workers' Co-operative Society Ltd. [1970] 25 S.T.C. 43. The ques...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shamshul Hasan vs Kuber Nath And Ors.
Judges: H Swarup
26 September, 1974·1. This is a petition for taking action against respondents for having committed contempt of this Court. The applicant prays that action be taken under Section 10 of the Contempt of Courts Act (hereinafter called the Act), which deals with the High Court's power to punish for contempt of courts subo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ratan Narain Mulla vs The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of U.P. ...
Judges: H Swarup
24 September, 1974·No doubt the State Government not being a natural person could not be ordered to be detained in civil prison, on the analogy of Corporations for which special provision is made in Order 39, Rule 5 but beyond that, both when a decree for a permanent injunction is executed and when an order of tempora...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner, Sales Tax vs Mittal Radios
Judges: S Chandra, K Seth
24 September, 1974·Prosecution and penalty notices were issued because cheque for Rs. 334.12 was dishonoured, but since the amount has been deposited, no action is required. 3. With this order the penalty proceedings concluded. 4. The regular assessment proceedings were initiated and conducted by the Sales Tax Officer...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gajraj And Ors. vs Collector Singh
Judges: D Mathur, K Srivastava, O Singh
24 September, 1974·The proviso is founded on the principle that forcible and wrongful dispossession is not to be recognised under the criminal law. So that it is not possible to say that such an act of dispossession was completed before the date of the order. To sax otherwise would mean that if a party who is forcibly...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Riazat Hussain vs Commissioner, Allahabad ...
Judges: R Gulati
24 September, 1974·2. It appears that the petitioner was involved in a case under Section 107/117, Cr.P.C. The District Magistrate, Allahabad, suspended the petitioner's licence for that reason and asked him to show cause why his licence should not be cancelled. The petitioner submitted a written reply which was not a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jayna Time Industries (Pvt.) Ltd. vs Industrial Tribunal (Iii) And ...
Judges: R Gulati
23 September, 1974·After the parties had exchanged pleadings, a sum of Rs. 41,680 was worked out as available surplus in the following manner: Profit for the year 1964- 65 (year ending 31-12- 2. Against this available surplus, the petitioner claimed to set off an aggregate sum of Rs. 1,36,263.00 on account of losses b...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Sales Tax vs Tata Iron And Steel Company Ltd.
Judges: S Chandra, K Seth
20 September, 1974·1. The question of law which requires consideration in this case is whether plain and corrugated sheets made of iron come under Section 3-AA of the U.P. Sales Tax Act or is taxable at 3 per cent as hardware. Clause (iv) of Section 3-AA(l) refers to iron and steel and it goes on to categorise the dif...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Sales Tax vs Import Association
Judges: S Chandra, K Seth
20 September, 1974·1. The question of law raised by this reference is "whether ammeter and voltmeter are electrical goods within the meaning of Notification No. ST-7096/X-1012-1965 dated 1st October, 1965". The relevant entry in this regard is at serial No. 7 of the above notification. It reads : Electrical goods othe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.