Tajammul Husain vs Mir Khan And Ors.
Judges: K Asthana, M Shukla, K Agrawal
22 February, 1974·"A permissible settlement by a mortgagee in possession with a tenant in the course of prudent management and the springing up of rights in the tenant conferred or created by statute based on the nature of the land and possession for the requisite period is a different matter altogether. It is an exc...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ahmad Husain vs Smt. Uma Devi Shukla And Ors.
Judges: J Lal
22 February, 1974·1. This second appeal arises out of a suit for eviction of the defendant-appellant from a plot of land which had been let out to him by the previous owner. That owner sold e portion of that land to the plaintiff-respondent No. 1 and the rest of it to the pro forma defendant-respondents Nos. 2 and 3....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Data Ram Satpal
Judges: S Chandra, R Gulati
21 February, 1974·3. In order to answer these questions it is necessary to set out the relevant provisions. Section 271(1)(c), before its amendment, was as under : "271. Failure to furnish returns, comply with notices, concealment of income, etc.--(1) If the Income-tax Officer or the Appellate Assistant Commissioner,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Faizuddin
Judges: R Gulati, H Seth
16 February, 1974·"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally correct in cancelling the penalty of Rs. 12,000 levied under Section 271(1)(c)/274(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. The assessee is an individual and derives income from various sources, including the running of ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Lalit Mohan
Judges: S Chandra, R Gulati
15 February, 1974·1. This is a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. Ex parte assessment orders were passed against Sri Lalit Mohan for the assessment years 1962-63 and 1963-64 and in due course penalties were levied on him under sections 271(1)(a), 271(1)(b) and 273(b) of the Income-tax Act,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Queens College, Kanetra And Anr. vs The Collector, Varanasi And Ors.
Judges: G Mathur
15 February, 1974·"41. Procedure and powers of Court -- Subject to the provisions of this Act and of rules made thereunder- (a) the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, shall apply to all proceedings before the Court, and to all appeals, under this Act, and (b) the Court shall have, for the purpose of, an...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Taran Shanker Singh vs Election Commissioner Of India ...
Judges: H Swarup, G Nath
14 February, 1974·5. The elections are held in accordance with the provisions contained in the Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961. Rules 5 and 10 of these Rules are relevant. Rule 5 runs as under: "5. Symbols for elections in Parliamentary and Assembly constituencies.- (1) The Election Commission shall, by notification...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Sales Tax, U.P., ... vs Jai Shri Products, Varanasi
Judges: R Gulati, H Seth, C Singh
14 February, 1974·"Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case hair pins, hair clips and tikulis are taxable as cosmetics and toilet requisites as defined in item No. 6 of Notification No. 905/X dated 31st March, 1956 and will be taxable at 6 per cent. or 7 per cent.?" 2. The assessee carried on the business o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Ram Nand Ram Kishan
Judges: S Chandra, R Gulati
14 February, 1974·1. This is a reference under Section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The assessee is a firm carrying on business in sugar and money-lending. During the proceedings for the assessment year 1957-58, it claimed to deduct from its income two sums of Rs. 1,02,356 and Rs. 69,537 due from M/s. Ja...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Nadir Ali And Company
Judges: S Chandra, R Gulati
14 February, 1974·1. This is a reference under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. In respect of the assessment year 1964-65, the assessee filed a return showing an income of Rs. 1,19,091 on the basis of accounts maintained by it. The Income-tax Officer was of the opinion that, having regard to the defective ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.