Brindaban vs State Of Uttar Pradesh
Judges: G Mathur
06 October, 1972·3. Before considering the material on which the learned Counsel places reliance in support of this contention, it would be proper to notice the principles laid down by the Supreme Court for judging the question of bias. In Manak Lai v. Dr. Prem Chand Singhvi A.I.R. 1967 S.C. 425, the Supreme Court o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Harnam Singh And Co.
Judges: R Gulati, C Singh
05 October, 1972·1. This is a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, Lucknow, on the following question: "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was justified legally in cancelling the order...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Union Of India (Uoi) vs Shervani Sugar Syndicate And Anr.
Judges: M Shukla, K Seth
05 October, 1972·(a) the cost of production of sugarcane; (b) the return to the grower from alternative crops and the general trend of prices of agricultural commodities; (c) the availability of sugar to the consumer at a fair price; (d) the price at which sugar produced from sugarcane is sold by producers of sugar;...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Balraj Virmani vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: R Gulati, C Singh
05 October, 1972·JUDGMENT Gulati, J. 1. This is a reference under Section 66(1) of the Income-tax Act. The assessee had advanced certain loans to a private limited company known as Virmani Refrigeration and Cold Storage Company Ltd. He was being assessed to tax on interest accruing on these loans from year to year. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P. vs Prem Spinning And Weaving Mills ...
Judges: S Chandra, N Ojha
05 October, 1972·5. On September 22, 1964, the State Government issued a notification under Section 3(b) of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act fixing the wages and dearness allowance of the employees of the respondent-company without splitting them up. In this notification it was pro-vided that the respondent-company ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nand Singh Taneja And Sons vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: S Chandra, N Ojha
04 October, 1972·5. The provision requiring consideration is Section 184(7) of the Act. It occurs in Chapter 16. Sub-chapter A thereof relates to assessment of firms. It consists of sections 182 and 183. Sub-chapter B deals with registration of firms. It consists of sections 184 to 186. Sub-chapter C provides for ch...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kundan Sugar Mills vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: R Gulati, T Misra
03 October, 1972·2. The assessment years involved in respect of the first question are 1954-55 to 1958-59, 1960-61 and 1961-62. The assessment year involved in respect of the second question is 1961-62. 3. The assessee was engaged in running two sugar mills, namely, Kundan Sugar Mills at Amroha and Pannijee Sugar Mi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lallu vs The Board Of Revenue, U.P., ...
Judges: G Mathur
03 October, 1972·"(2) Where the Court is satisfied- (a) that a suit must fail by reason of some formal defect, or (b) that there are other sufficient grounds for allowing the plaintiff to institute a fresh suit for the subject-matter of a suit or part of a claim, it may, on such terms as it thinks fit, grant the pla...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.