P.C. Kapoor vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: R Gulati, H Seth, C Singh
06 December, 1972·11. Learned counsel for the revenue referred us to paragraphs 334 and 337 of the U.P. Excise Manual which read as follows: "334. No licence shall be issued in the name of a company or firm unless such company or firm is a registered joint stock company. Where a licence has been granted to an unregis...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Narendra Lal vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: R Gulati, H Seth, C Singh
06 December, 1972·3. It will be seen that the two branches, i.e., Rajendra Lal and Narendra Lal, got equal shares. For the assessment year 1962-63, the Income-tax Officer included the value of the shares allotted to the wife and daughters of Narendra Lal in the total wealth of the assessee, Narendra Lal, under Sectio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P. vs L. Rama Gopal Gupta And Ors.
Judges: B Gupta, M Shukla, K Seth
05 December, 1972·3. Under Sub-section (3) of Section 14 of the Act no court is to take cognizance of any offence punishable under the Act or under any Scheme except on a complaint made with the previous sanction of such authority as may be specified In this behalf by the appropriate Government. It is not disputed th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ganga Ram And Anr. vs Tribeni Rai And Anr.
Judges: T Misra
05 December, 1972·2. The trial court dismissed the suit. The appeal preferred by the plaintiffs was also dismissed, They have now come to this Court in second appeal. 3. Both the courts below have held that the disputed opening in the wall had been in existence for more than 20 years. The learned counsel for the plai...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shanker Dayal Agarwala vs The State Of U.P. And Anr.
Judges: M Shukla
04 December, 1972·3. The contention of the appellant was that on the facts of this case special damage should have been presumed. The learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the rights claimed by the plaintiff were wholly unfounded inasmuch as the land in question had not been proved to be a lane or a publ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kailash Chand And Ors. vs Bhupal Nath And Ors.
Judges: T Misra
04 December, 1972·3. It was urged on behalf of the appellants that as the plaintiffs had failed to prove the case set up by them they were not entitled to the reliefs claimed in the suit. It was also urged that the plaintiffs could not prove their title to the property involved in the suit nor to the land on which th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jai Narain Pandey vs Lallan Tiwari And Ors.
Judges: T Misra
01 December, 1972·In Arjan Singh's case AIR 1951 SC 193 (Supra) it was laid down that the discretion given to the Appellate Court by Order 41, Rule 27 to receive and admit additional evidence is not an arbitrary one, but is a judicial one circumscribed by the limitations specified in that rule. If the additional evid...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.