Bishal Chand Jain vs Chattur Sen And Ors.
Judges: S Verma, R Prasad
20 September, 1966·..do swear in the name of God/solemnly affirm that I will bear true faith and the laws" made only by a person who has been appointed Chief Justice or a Judge of a High Court A person who has not been appointed Chief Justice or a Judge of a High Court, therefore, cannot make oath in the above prescri...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
J.K. Cotton Spg. & Wvg. Mills Co. ... vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: S Manchanda, M Beg
16 September, 1966·(v) That if the Government lost the case, it would not reflect any credit on them or their officers and advisers. (vi) That the company thought that even if the proceedings failed the mere fact of the proceedings having been launched against it, would reflect adversely on its business reputation (vi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
J. K. Cotton Spinning & Weaving ... vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U. P.
Judges:
16 September, 1966·(iii) That the matter had become stale as more than 2 years had lapsed since the police raid on the premises of Messrs. Kanodia Brothers. (iv) That the matter may have to be tough out up to the highest court in the land and would take a number of years. (v) That if the Government lost the case, it w...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
K. P. Bhargava vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U. P.
Judges:
15 September, 1966·"Whether the surplus of Rs. 37,385 arising from the sale of plant and machinery of an ice factory is chargeable to income-tax under section 10(2) (vii) of the income-tax Act as deemed income of the assesse ?" The finding of fact given by the tribunal is that the business was not carried on during th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Annapurna And Anr. vs Munshi And Ors.
Judges: G Prasad
13 September, 1966·1. The main contention raised in this appeal on behalf of the defendants-appellants is that the benefit of Section 43 of the Transfer of Property Act is not available in respect of a transfer made to contravention of Section 153 of the U. P Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, and the plaintiff...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hari Ram Mittal vs Zila Parishad And Ors.
Judges: G Mathur
12 September, 1966·So long as the Antarim Zila Parishad was not constituted for a district, the Collector was to take over the administration of the affairs of the board and io exercise, perform and discharge the powers, functions and duties of the board, the President and committees of the board. By a notification da...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Allahabad Woollen Mills (P.) Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U. P.
Judges:
09 September, 1966·Muster roll in Form 12 ......... Watch and Wards ......... Clerical staff ......... He pointed out that "as the factory employed 51 persons on the above date, and as the strength of the employees of the factory has always remained 50 or more persons, thereafter the Regional Provident Fund Commission...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sri Kashi Prasad Saksena vs State Of Uttar Pradesh
Judges: J Sahai, R Chandra
06 September, 1966·"(1) A notary may do all or any of the following acts by virtue of his office, namely (a) verify, authenticate, certify or attest the execution of any instrument: (b) present any promissory note, hundi or hill of exchange for acceptance or payment or demand better security: (c) note or protest the d...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sales Tax Commissioner vs Ram Kumar Agarwal
Judges: S Manchanda, M Beg
06 September, 1966·4. Bullion was, undoubtedly, the stock-in-trade of the assessee's business and it was certainly not given as cash for the purchase of ornaments, and, as such, it might have been possible for the department to contend that bullion was given as "other valuable consideration' within the meaning of Sect...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mashkurul Hasan vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr.
Judges: M Beg
05 September, 1966·4. The ground taken in second appeal in this Court, that the judgment of the lower Appellate Court, consisting of a few lines, does not comply with Order 41 Rule 31 of the Code is not without some force. Nevertheless, after examining the plaint and the solitary statement of the plaintiff, and, havin...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.