Swami Nath Singh And Ors. vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors.
Judges: K Asthana
10 October, 1966·4a. Section 17 of the Forest Act reads as follows: "17. Any person who has made a claim under this Act, or any Forest Officer or other person generally or specially empowered by the State Government in this behalf, may, within three months from the date of the order passed on such claim by the Fores...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
H.H. Maharaja Vibhuti Narain ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh.
Judges:
10 October, 1966·"(a) any rent or revenue derived from land which is used for agricultural purposes and is either assessed to land revenue in Uttar Pradesh or is subject to a local rate or cess assessed and collected by an officer of the State Government; (b) any income derived from such land by, (i) agriculture, or...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hazari Lal Roop Chand vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U. P.
Judges:
10 October, 1966·"1. Whether there was any material on the basis of which the Tribunal could come to the conclusion that with Rs. 28,200 the assessee was carrying on any business for his own benefit, and the sum of Rs. 28,200 was not merely an advance to Panna Lal ? 2. If the answer to the first question is in the a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sri Ram Sahney vs Commissioner Of Sales Tax
Judges: S Manchanda, M Beg
07 October, 1966·2. The question referred is as follows : Whether for assessment under Section 21 for 1954-55 for which four years limitation expired on 31st March, 1959, respecting which Section 21 proceedings started on an information of suppression of bales imported to the tune of 36 in number respecting which se...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Onkar Nath vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, ...
Judges:
06 October, 1966·This order was passed on the 9th of October, 1957. The period of limitation had long since expired for taking any further action under section 34 against any one of the partners and, therefore, unless such a direction was issued no action could have been taken by the Income-tax Officer. Pursuant to ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Dass vs Board Of Revenue And Ors.
Judges: S Singh
06 October, 1966·They further alleged that in accordance with the agreement the vendees had to pay a further amount of Rs. 300 to get the sale completed. According to the defence since the defendants had entered into possession over the disputed property after having advanced Rs. 100 they were entitled to the benefi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
J.K. Jute Mills Co. Ltd. vs Sales Tax Officer And Ors.
Judges: R Pathak
06 October, 1966·2. Mr. Jngdish Sarup for the petitioner has raised two contentions before me. 3. The first contention is that the petitioner is not in default and, therefore, the certificates of recovery and the consequent recovery proceedings are without jurisdiction. He urges that inasmuch as the total amount ref...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kanhaiya Lal Gupta vs Ajeet Kumar Dey And Ors.
Judges: G Mathur
05 October, 1966·1. The petitioner is an employer admittedly employing less than fifty persons. For certain trade reasons the employer laid off five workman who are respondents 1 to 5 In this petition for a period of seventeen days In January 1961. The employer did not pay them any wages for the period of lay-off. R...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bharat Oil Industries vs Commissioner, Income-Tax
Judges: S Manchanda, M Beg
03 October, 1966·The share income continued to be so assessed in the hands of Sita Ram from 1943-44 to 1957-58 in his status as an individual. The firm of Radha Kishan Sita Ram was also carrying on an oil crushing business under the name and style of Bharat Oil Industries. This it decided to close down. Sita Ram it ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Satya Narain vs Smt. Nanki Devi
Judges: S Dhavan
03 October, 1966·(2) he was in a position to dominate her will; (3) she was a widow of immature under-standing and not conversant with the preparation of documents; (4) he was getting various papers signed by her under the pretext that they were required in connection with the litigation in Fatehpur; (5) It appeared...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.