Bansal And Co. vs Income-Tax Officer, D-Ward, ...
Judges:
30 September, 1964·On the 6th of June, 1964, another warrant of attachment was issued which is the one impugned in these proceedings. The actual attachment of the movables was made on the 24th June, 1964. The present writ petition was filed on the 18th July, 1964. The petition was not supported by an affidavit on pers...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Swaroop Himmat Singh vs State And Anr.
Judges: H Tripathi
25 September, 1964·4. Learned Counsel for the applicant has strenuously contended that as the Trial Magistrate has given good reasons for Holding that the dispute between the parties was of a Civil Nature and as he had the jurisdiction, to discharge the accused at any stage of the proceedings, the learned Additional D...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Girja Debi And Anr. vs The Rent Control And Eviction ...
Judges: M Desai, R Pathak
22 September, 1964·4. As regards Rule 6, the District Magistrate might have been required to permit appellant No. 1 to occupy the accommodation herself, if he had been satisfied that it was bona fide needed by her for her own personal occupation. Here the District Magistrate has found that it was not required by her f...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jaggan Nath And Anr. vs Laxmi Narain And Anr.
Judges: H Tripathi
21 September, 1964·3. In support of its case the prosecution has mainly relied on the testimony furnished by five eye-witnesses of the occurrence and on the dying declaration which was supposed to have been recorded at the hospital by Dr. S. C. Agarwal who was examined to prove the same. In corroboration of the testim...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Benaras State Bank Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U.P.
Judges:
21 September, 1964·Admittedly the securities were issued by the erstwhile States of Travancore and Cochin some time before 1947, and certainly before the erstwhile State of Benaras merged in the Union of India on October 15, 1949. The taxation laws were made applicable to the areas forming part of the erstwhile State ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Govind Ram vs Income-Tax Officer, C-Ward, ...
Judges:
15 September, 1964·The assessment, however, for both these years was taken up simultaneously and in the course of the assessment proceedings the actual receipts in respect of the alleged sale of ornaments, which took place on the 1st of November, 1957, were also filed along with the receipts for the sale which took pl...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sharda Prasad Vishwakarma vs Stata Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors.
Judges: B Gupta
11 September, 1964·3. There is no controversy that during the relevant period two disputes were pending between the management and some of its workmen, including the petitioner. One of the disputes was before the conciliation board as Case No. 13 of 1981, whereas the other dispute was pending before the industrial tri...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mathura Prasad vs Mohd. Umar Khan And Anr.
Judges: J Takru, T Ramabhadran
11 September, 1964·1. Has the plaintiff got any causes of action for the suit? If so, against which of the defendants? 2. Is the pronote without consideration? 3. Has it been executed under the circumstances as alleged by the defendant No. 1? If so, can a suit be maintained on the pronote and is it negotiable? 4. Has ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gopal Narain Misra vs Regional Appellate Committee And ...
Judges: B Nigam, R Sharma
10 September, 1964·4. The first question for our consideration is whether the order of termination was one of punishment. Annexure 2 reads: "You are hereby informed that owing to the abolition of the teaching of civics and History in the intermediate classes in this institution from July 1960 your services will no mor...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ved Singh Pradhan vs Assistant Sub-Divisional ...
Judges: M Desai, R Pathak
10 September, 1964·"Issue notice. Let an ad interim order issue staying operation of the order made by respondent No. 1 dated 26-5-59." Under Section 95 (2) a person removed under Sub-section (iii) of Clause (g) of Sub-section (1) of Section 95 shall not be entitled to be re-elected or re-appointed to any office under...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.