Krishna Agarwal vs Bhawani Prasad Girdhar Lal
Judges: S Dhavan, K Asthana
31 January, 1964·1. This is a judgment-debtor's appeal from the order of the First Additional Civil Judge, Kanpur, dismissing his objection against the transfer of the decree from the Kanpur Court to the Allahabad Court. The appellant is an Advocate of this Court. The plaintiff respondent obtained a decree against t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jhamman Lal And Ors. vs Deputy Custodian General And Ors.
Judges: V Oak, S Chandra
30 January, 1964·6. He relied upon a decision by a Division Bench of this court in Dwarika Prasad v. Board of Revenue, 1957 All LJ 593. In that case there was a compromise between the parties in a suit under Section 180, U. P. Tenancy Act. The compromise was dated 19-2-1951. It was agreed that the respondents should...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Municipal Board vs Rizwan Beg
Judges: M Beg
30 January, 1964·(b) The factory owner and employees shall afford every facility in connection of samples. 4. If a sample is unsatisfactory and the Medical Officer of Health considers that the ice should not be allowed to be sold, he will have the ice destroyed to his satisfaction with the help of his staff. 5. If s...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M.A. And Company vs Assistant Commissioner ...
Judges: M Desai, R Pathak
28 January, 1964·5. The petitioner contends that the Sales Tax Officer could not in law refuse him permission Under Section 7-E to pay an amount by way of composition on the ground that his applications in this behalf were barred by time, and that as he was entitled to the grant of such permission he was not liable ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Purshottam Das vs State Of Uttar Pradesh
Judges: S Manchanda
28 January, 1964·4. If the question could have been said not to tie the hands of the High Court only to ascertaining the position in fact as to partition, then manifestly, there was no doubt in the mind of the learned Chief Justice, and if I may say so with respect, rightly, that the decree of the Civil Court declar...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Union Of India (Uoi) vs Ramji Lal And Ors.
Judges: S Katju
24 January, 1964·7. The question, however, is whether under these circumstances the first defendant was protected by the provisions of Section 6 of the Indian Post Office Act. A postal article may be divided under the following categories: 1. A postal article seat by ordinary post 2. A postal article sent after regi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pt. Deo Sharma vs Income-Tax Officer, District ...
Judges:
23 January, 1964·Sub-section (5), (6) and (7) were inserted in section 35 of the Income-tax Act by the Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1953 (No. XXV of 1953). It was provided in the Amendment Act that the amendment would have effect from April 1, 1952. Mr. R. L. Gulati appearing for the petitioner contended that,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Khanjan Lal Sewak Ram vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U.P.
Judges:
21 January, 1964·The question formulated by the Tribunal is not proper; it suggests that a firm which has distributed all its profits including undisclosed profits is entitled to registration regardless of other facts, which is not correct. In order to be entitled to registration it must make an application in the p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kanhaiya Lal Radha Krishna vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax.
Judges:
21 January, 1964·The question formulated by the Tribunal is on the face of it wrong. It is not the question in respect of which this court called upon it to state the case. It had no jurisdiction to formulate a question different from that in respect of which a statement was called for by this court. We, therefore, ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Panna Lal Ram Kishore vs The Sales Tax Officer And Anr.
Judges: M Desai, R Pathak
21 January, 1964·The non-obstante clause in Section 8(2) of the Central Act ignores only the non-liability to pay the State tax under Section 3, i.e. on account of the assessee's turnover being of less than Rs. 12,000/-; if he is not liable to pay the State tax under another provision such as a notification issued u...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.