Bholanath vs Balbhadra Prasad And Ors.
Judges: S Dhavan, K Asthana
26 February, 1964·It was denied that the defendant executed any deed as alleged by the plaintiff or received any amount as earnest money ft was further con tended that the written agreement was obtained by the plaintiff by fraud and therefore invalid. The defendant also alleged that it was without consideration. 3. B...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hira Lal Sutwala vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U.P. ...
Judges:
26 February, 1964·2. Whether the order of rectification passed by the Income-tax Officer under section 35 of the Act on March 31, 1948, was legal and valid ?" The assessee, an individual, is a partner in two firms : (1) Ganesh Prasad Dalal (which for the sake of brevity will be known as firm "G"), and (2) Bhojnagarwa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gajadhar Singh vs Harnandan Singh And Ors.
Judges: M Desai, B Dayal, R Pathak
25 February, 1964·B. Dayal, J. 13. Two connected appeals have been referred to this Full Bench because of a common question of law that has arisen in. both of them. A second question has also been referred to this Bench fn Second Appeal No. 1538 of 1957. The common question is in the following words;- "Whether for th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kishan Chand vs Ram Babu
Judges: M D Takru, B Gupta
25 February, 1964·5. Because the interest ought to have been allowed to the appellant" The appellate court allowed the appeal and held that the appellant had failed to prove himself to be an agriculturist because he had not proved that he did not pay income-tax or that if he paid income-tax it was not of an amount ex...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bal Gopal Das vs Mohan Singh And Anr.
Judges: V Bhargava, S Khare, G Mathur
19 February, 1964·"Is the Tribunal constituted under the Displaced Persons (Debts Adjustment) Act, No. 70 of 1951, a Court subordinate to the High Court within the meaning oE Section 115 Civil Procedure Code. Does a revision under Section 115 Civil Procedure Code lie against an order passed by such Tribunal?" The ref...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vidya Bhushan Chandra Shekhar And ... vs Parag Balbhadra And Ors.
Judges: M Desai, R Sharma
19 February, 1964·"(i) Assistant Consolidation Officer; (ii) Consolidation Officer; (iii) Settlement Officer (Consolidation); (iv) Assistant Director (Consolidation); and (v) Director of Consolidation." The Consolidation Officer condoned the delay in filing the objection and proceeded to dispose of it himself. The re...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Khageshwar vs Hoshram And Ors.
Judges: M Desai, R Sharma
18 February, 1964·1. The appellant is Khageshwar and respondent No. 1 is his brother, Hoshram. During the consolidation proceedings a statement mentioned in Section 8 of the Consolidation of Holdings Act was prepared. The dispute between the appellant and the respondent is about certain land which is claimed by the a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Loon Karan Sethiya And Anr. vs Additional Collector And Ors.
Judges: V Bhargava, G Mathur
13 February, 1964·3. In the appeal filed by Loon Karan Sethiya and another, the only point that has been urged before us by learned counsel is that the learned Single Judge was wrong in holding that the provisions of the Act were applicable to the mill which was being run by them because it should be held that the fa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raja Yuvraj Dutta Singh vs Income-Tax Officer, A-Ward, ...
Judges:
12 February, 1964·Learned counsel for the appellant complains that the grounds upon which the instant petition was dismissed are not sustainable. He points out that the petition was filed three days after receipt of the notice of demand for the assessment year 1949-50 and that the existence of an alternative remedy c...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Chand Textile vs Sales Tax Officer
Judges: M D Sahai, D Uniyal, R Pathak, G Prasad
12 February, 1964·spective effect was insufficient to validate the notification. The notification No. S. T. 117/X which was issued under Section 3A cannot be compared with the notification issued In Finn Bangali Mal Satish Chandra Jain's case, 1958 AH LJ 228: (AIR 1958 All 478 (FB)) without any authority whatsoever. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.