Mainpur Electric Supply And ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh
Judges: B Mukerji, M Manchanda
29 September, 1961·There was a proviso to the above and the proviso was in these words : "Provided, however, that in the case of receipt of bulk supply of energy from Hydel before the expiry of 10 years from the date of notification ot this licence, the licensees shall not be asked to sell the undertaking to a party o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Syed Zahoor Haider vs Collector Of Muzaffarnagar And ...
Judges:
28 September, 1961·It is urged that the recovery proceedings, being beyond one year of the disposal of the appeal are barred by limitation and are, therefore, incompetent. A counter-affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent that information about the dismissal of the appeal was received in the office of the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Lakhan vs Income-Tax Officer, Kanpur, And ...
Judges:
27 September, 1961·A different not seems to have been struck in a Division Bench case of this court in Rani Kanno Dai v. B. J. Lacy. At pages 236-37 of the report, it was observed as follows : "There can be no doubt, as we conceive the law to be in this country, that this lady, as the widow of a separated and sonless ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gupta And Company vs Sales Tax Officer
Judges: B Gupta
27 September, 1961·(ii) in a case falling under Clause (a), until a period of 60 days has expired after the date on which the return is required to be furnished under Section 7. 2. The reasons given in the penalty order, which is annexure "D" to the petitioner's affidavit, for imposing penalty, are that as the dealer ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sri Ram Lakhan vs Income-Tax Officer, Kanpur.
Judges:
27 September, 1961·A different note seems to have been struck in a division bench case of this court in Rani Kanno Dai v. B.J. Lacy. At page 236 of the report, it was observed as follows : "There can be no doubt, as we conceive the law to be in this country, that this lady, as the widow of a separated and sonless Hind...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
British India Corporation Ltd. vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors.
Judges: B Gupta
26 September, 1961·5. Two supplementary affidavits were filed, in addition to the affidavit originally filed with the petition. By these supplementary affidavits, a valiant effort has been made to explain the delay, which was caused in filing the writ petition. It is not possible to come to the conclusion that the del...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shri Chhotey Lal, Kanpur vs Income-Tax Officer, C-Ward, ...
Judges:
26 September, 1961·2. For purposes of the Income-tax Act, income-tax, penalty and interest have been viewed independently of each other as, for example, under section 29, where tax, penalty and interest are spoken of separately. Accordingly, when section 46 speaks of default in payment of "income-tax" and imposition o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kailash Nath Bhargava vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U.P. ...
Judges:
25 September, 1961·It would contribute towards the proper adjudication on the two submissions made before us if the scope and the scheme of this section were clearly understood. Section 25A is a machinery section. It was enacted to meet the difficulty of levying and collecting income-tax in cases where a joint Hindu f...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Official Liquidator vs Mathura Prasad And Ors.
Judges: A Srivastava
22 September, 1961·For the preparation of the chart and the finding out of the valuation of the various items the registers filed bv the Liquidator may be for the present returned to him but he must bring them back and file them in Court on the date which has now been fixed for arguments. During the week which has bee...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sri A.C. Agrawal vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr.
Judges: M Desai, T Ramabhadran
21 September, 1961·3. It was vehemently contended before us that the enquiry into the fictitious nature of the sale was barred by the provision contained in Order XXXIII, Rule 5 (c). That provision is to the effect that the court shall reject an application for permission to sue as a pauper where the applicant has: "w...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.