Ram Kishan Sunder Lal And Anr. vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh And Anr.
Judges: B Gupta
31 August, 1961·4. I regret I cannot agree with the interpretation put by the learned counsel on Sub-sections (2) and (3) of Section 14. 5. The sections of the Indian Coinage Act which are relevant are Sections 6, 13 and 14. Section 6 makes provision for the coining of coins at the mint. It provides for their denom...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abid Husain Khan vs Bashir Mohammad And Ors.
Judges: V Bhargava, B Gupta
31 August, 1961·3. The scope of the word 'appeal' as used in Clause (2) of col. 3 of Article 182 of the Limitation Act has come up for decision before various Courts in various cases. The leading case used to be a decision of the Privy Council--Nagendra Nath v. Suresh Chandra, AIR 1913 PC 165. It is however not ver...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kedar Nath And Ors. vs Chandra Kiran And Ors.
Judges: N Beg
30 August, 1961·ORDER N.U. Beg, J. 1. This is an application under Order 23 Rule 1, Sub-rule (1), C. P. C. given by the plaintiffs appellants in Second Appeal No. 1757 of 1959 for permission to withdraw the suit filed by them against the defendants-respondents. It is argued on behalf of the applicants that they hav...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sant Ram And Ors. vs Labh Singh And Anr.
Judges: A Srivastava, B Dayal
28 August, 1961·14. The question whether the validity of the law of pre-emption has been affected by the coming into force of the Constitution has been considered by the various High Courts in a number of cases but the decisions do not appear to be uniform. The question has been raised before the Supreme Court in B...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Chief Inspector Of Stamps vs Uggar Sen And Ors.
Judges: D Mathur
26 August, 1961·3. Ugger Sen affixed a court-fee stamp of Rs. 2.50 Paise on the memorandum of appeal treating it as an appeal from an order covered by Schedule II, Article 11 of the Court-fees Act. The appeal was valued at Rs. 38,172.50 Paise. The Inspector of Stamps raised an objection that the court-fee paid was ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Tara Chand Kalloo Ram vs Sales Tax Officer
Judges: B Gupta
24 August, 1961·3. Sub-rule (6) of the said rule provides as follows : 41. (6) If the tax assessed differs from the total amount deposited or paid by cheque, the difference shall be realised or refunded by the Sales Tax Officer, as the case may be. 4. Thus it is clear that the provisional assessment is liable to be...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Charan Agarwala And Ors. vs Shridhar Misra And Ors.
Judges: A Srivastava, J Shahi
24 August, 1961·2. Is plaintiff No. 1 properly represented for filing this suit? 3. Is plaintiff No. 2 entitled to file this suit? 4. Is the suit barred by Section 9, C. P.C. and Section 42, Specific Relief Act? 5. Has the court no power to entertain the suit as framed? 6. To what relief, if any, are the plaintiffs...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kripa Nath And Anr. vs Ganga Prasad And Ors.
Judges: A Srivastava, B Gupta
23 August, 1961·6. The two points which have been urged by the learned counsel for the appellants in support of the appeal are: (1) That the finding of the learned Civil Judge that the full consideration of the mortgage bond had not been paid was incorrect; and (2) that the suit should not have been thrown out on t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Messrs. Sohan Pathak And Sons vs Commissioner Or Income-Tax, ...
Judges:
22 August, 1961·Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. A. P. Rs. A. P. 1-9-39 to 21-10-39 3,923 5,387 ... 1,464 ... 22-10-39 to 9-10-40 29,128 34,742 ... 5,614 ... 10-10-40 to 29-10-41 27,137 35,000 ... 7,863 ... 30-9-41 to 18-10-42 37,658 37,839 ... 10,239 ... 19-10-42 to 16-7-43 68,652 26,709 41,943 ... 11,175-9-0 17-7-43 to 8-10-4...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Messrs. Ramgopal Ram Prasad vs Income-Tax Officer, Kanpur, And ...
Judges:
22 August, 1961·Further, as already pointed out above, no attempt has been made as to why, when the petitioner became aware of the orders on the 20th March, 1953, he took more than one month to file the revisions before the Commissioner. The remedy by an application in revision is not as of right, but a discretiona...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.