Hailey Glass Works And Ors. vs Deputy Labour Commissioner ...
Judges: S Dhavan
17 April, 1961·Matter of dispute Should the employers mentioned in the schedule be required to revise the wages of their workmen of various categories mentioned in the annexure; if so, with what details? J. Pkasad, Dy. Labour Commissioner (Industrial Relations), U. P. 2. Before the tribunal could hear the dispute,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dominion Of India vs Kaniz Fatma And Anr.
Judges: M Lal
17 April, 1961·10. The last argument arises out of the doctrine of common employment which was laid down by this Court in the case of Elizabeth C. Blanchette v. Secretary of State for India 9 A.L.J. 173. That was also a case of collision between two passenger trains. The deceased was a driver on one of the two eng...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mangoo Lal vs Maharaj Singh And Ors.
Judges: M Lal
13 April, 1961·5. Learned counsel for the appellant has contended that when debts had been incurred for the purposes of family by the manager of the family, the family property remains liable for payment of these debts and consequently before the family property is allotted to the share of any member, a provision ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rakeshwar Dayal vs Labour Court And Ors.
Judges: S Dhavan
11 April, 1961·1. This is Rakeshwar Dayal's petition under Article 226 of the Constitution directed against an award of the labour court, Kanpur. The respondents are Begg Sutherland and Company, Ltd., Kanpur, a subsidiary of the British India Corporation, Ltd., Kanpur. The facts as alleged in the petitioner's affi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shridhar Udai Narayan vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U. P. ...
Judges:
10 April, 1961·The second proceedings that started at this stage was the decision of the appeal on merits by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner in pursuance of the appellate order of the Tribunal dated 13th July, 1950. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner when disposing of the appeal after remand upheld the asse...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P. vs Lakshmi Narain Singhal
Judges: W Broome
04 April, 1961·6. The fundamental question is whether in the circumstances, of this case the serving of the notice under Section 80 C. P. C. on the Magistrate by Laxmi Narain Singhal amounts to contempt or not. I am satisfied that there may be cases in which the service of such a notice on a Magistrate by a person...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P. vs Jag Raj
Judges: M D Sahai, B Dayal
03 April, 1961·3. The question whether an appeal lies to the Supreme Court under Article 134 or not is within the sole jurisdiction of the Supreme Court; a High Court has absolutely no jurisdiction to decide this question. In fact a certificate granted by the High Court does not bind the Supreme Court and their Lo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The U.P. State vs Murtaza Ali And Anr.
Judges: M Desai, B Mukerji, S Dwivedi
03 April, 1961·10. Only one resolution is required to be passed by a board for punishing, dismissing or removing its executive officer, and not two- The impugned regulations, on the other hand, contemplate two decisions, one finding the executive officer guilty and the other imposing punishment. Unless the board h...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P. vs Jag Raj
Judges: M D Sahai, B Dayal
03 April, 1961·All that the High Court has to do is to prima facie satisfy itself that the order sought to be appealed from is one contemplated by the first clause of Article 134 and then to see whether it also answers the requirements of Sub-clause (a), (b) or (c) of Article 134(1). If the order sought to be appe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.