Amod Kumar Verma vs Hari Prasad Burman And Ors.
Judges: M Desai, N Beg
31 October, 1957·Even apart from the question of jurisdiction I am of the view that the trial court had no justification to pass the decree without any prayer for the same by any of the parties to the arbitration agreement, without the question whether a decree could be passed or not being discussed or considered, w...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Someshwar Dayal And Ors. vs Widow Of Lalman Shah And Ors.
Judges: B Mukerji, R Singh
31 October, 1957·While dealing with this submission of the learned counsel the late Mr. Justice Kidwai observed that the executing Court had no power to extend the time fixed by the trial Court under the provisions of Section 148, Cr. P. C. But nevertheless, he did express the view that since there was no proper app...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohammad Ahmad Kidwai vs Chairman, Improvement Trust, ...
Judges: B Mukerji, R Singh, J Tandon
30 October, 1957·(2) ...... ....... ...... ...... ...... ....... (3) No such person as aforesaid shall be dismissed or reduced in rank until he has been given a reasonable opportunity of showing cause against the action proposed to be taken in regard to him: Provided that this Sub-section shall not apply- (a) where ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M.R. Melhotra And Anr. vs State
Judges: V Bhargava, A Mulla
30 October, 1957·Though these two chapters follow Section 251, clearly, the provisions in these chapters cannot be applied to the trial of warrant cases by Magistrates and cannot be said to have been referred to by the use of the word 'following' in Section 251. Section 350 is placed in Chapter XXIV which comes subs...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Wali Mohammad And Ors. vs Taqi And Ors.
Judges: B Mukherji, R Singh, J Tandon
30 October, 1957·In the alternative they pleaded that they had obtained tenancy rights by adverse possession. The trial court decreed the claim in respect of plot No. 233 but rejected the claim for possession of plot No. 232 on the ground that the defendants had acquired tenancy rights in this plot under Section 180...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Narain Ram Agarhari vs Chandi Prasad Dubey And Anr.
Judges: D Roy, V Oak
29 October, 1957·The sate was confirmed by the court on 12-2-1929 and Suraj Prasad obtained formal or symbolical possession of the property through the court Amin on 23-4-1932. Suraj Prasad, however, never got into actual possession of the property; and neither he nor the plaintiffs enjoyed any part of the usufruct ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Lal Rajaram vs G.D. Mehrotra & Co. And Ors.
Judges: O Mootham, A Srivastava
28 October, 1957·4. The petition was admitted and an interim order was passed that the status quo be maintained. Thereafter an application was made on behalf of the appellant pointing out that the lease in his favour had been executed before the petition was filed and praying that its registration may be permitted. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Yar Muhammad And Anr. vs Lakshmi Das And Ors.
Judges: R Dayal, G Mehrotra, A Srivastava
28 October, 1957·Whatever may be the nature of the dispute, therefore, if it relates to agricultural land and can in any way be considered to be of the nature specified in the Fourth Schedule of the U. P. Tenancy Act, the revenue court alone is entitled to hear it. No other court can have jurisdiction to entertain i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahesh Chandra And Anr. vs Tara Chand Modi
Judges: R Gurtu, B Mukerji, S Sahai
25 October, 1957·Sections 87-A (7) and (11) of the Act, therefore, which require that a copy of the motion should be read and forwarded, were not complied with. If the failure to comply with Section 87-A (7) and Section 87-A (11) of the Act nullifies the non-confidence motion and communication and the requirements o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lala Shanti Sarup vs Janak Singh And Ors.
Judges: Mootham, R Dayal, Mukerji, Srivastava, B Dayal
21 October, 1957·On behalf of the defendant-appellants, it was pleaded that the suit was time-barred as the claim of the plaintiff-respondents was a claim for compensation for breach of the contract which was entered into by a registered document so that the period of limitation for the suit was six years form the d...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.