Srimahant Visheshwar ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors.
Judges: Mehrotra
30 July, 1956·2. The Governor being further of the opinion that the provisions of Sub-section (1-A) of Section 17 of the said Act are applicable to the land is pleased under Sub-section (4) of the said section to direct that the provisions of Section 5A of the Act shall not apply." Thereafter on 19-1-1956 another...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Sales Tax Officer And Ors. vs Kanhaiya Lal Makund Lal Sarraf
Judges: Mootham, Chaturvedi
30 July, 1956·2. The question raised by the applicants is whether moneys voluntarily paid as tax by an assessee, under a law to which the assessee had submitted but which is later declared invalid, is a payment under a mistake of fact or law which is recoverable. There is no doubt that the question is one of grea...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shahzad Khan vs Pt. Sheo Kumar
Judges: V Bhargava
30 July, 1956·3. In the plaint the property was -described as 29 plots measuring 19 bighas, The suit was decreed and the entire decretal amount has been deposited and the property redeemed. It is alleged that the plaintiff is in possession of the entire mortgaged property, i.e. 40 bighas, 8 biswas and 14 biswansi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Girraj Kishore vs The State Through Municipal Board
Judges: Roy
27 July, 1956·By a resolution dated 19-9-1950, the Municipal Board of Agra authorised the Medical Officer of Health under Section 12, U. P. Prevention of Adulteration Act as the person who can make the order for prosecution under the Act. By a subsequent resolution dated 30-8-1951 the Municipal Board of Agra in-e...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chote Lal vs Mangali And Ors.
Judges: V Bhargava
26 July, 1956·But on 1-2-1930 Niranjan Lal mortgaged these two houses to the plaintiff. On 27-5-1937 Niranjan Lal converted the mortgage into a sale. The plaintiff was never able to obtain possession of either of the houses. In the year 1938, after obtaining the sale deed from Niranjan Lal, the plaintiff brought ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bachan Pande And Ors. vs The State
Judges: Asthana
26 July, 1956·There is no doubt that if the charge against the applicants is of conspiracy simpliciter and for no other offence they can only be tried in that district where the conspiracy was formed and where the offence of conspiracy was complete. I am, however, not inclined to accept the contention on behalf o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Panna Lal Babu Lal vs The Commissioner Of Sales Tax, ...
Judges: Mootham, Upadhya
24 July, 1956·The plaintiff claimed damages, and the question arose as to what was the relationship between the parties. If the relationship was that of a principal and agent the liability and measure of damages would be different from that which it would be if the relationship was that of a vendor and purchaser....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Janki Prasad And Ors. vs Kailash And Anr.
Judges: H Shankar, R Singh
17 July, 1956·2. It appears that in execution of a money decree for Rs. 9,716/11/- a house known as "Maiku Lal Bhawan" was attached and sold at auction. The house was purchased by Janki Prasad, applicant 1, in execution of the decree which stood in favour of Sm. Tara Devi who is dead and is now represented by app...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sales Tax Officer And Ors. vs J.L. Morison Son And Jones (India) ...
Judges: Mootham, Chaturvedi
16 July, 1956·2. The respondent company is incorporated under the Indian Companies Act and has its registered office in Bombay. It has branch offices at Calcutta, Madras and Delhi, but it is common ground that it has no office or agent within this State. In the course however of its business the company supplied ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.