L. Pyare Lal vs Governor-General Of India In ...
Judges: Mootham, Agarwala
18 January, 1956·The learned Civil Judge was, however, further of opinion that the loss of ghee from 16 tins and the shortage of ghee in 19 tins was not due to the misconduct of the administration, and it is that part of his finding which has been strongly challanged in this Court. Learned counsel for the appellant ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lakshmi Devi Sugar Mills Ltd. vs Labour Appellate Tribunal And ...
Judges: M Chaturvedi
16 January, 1956·The petitioner then went up in appeal to the Labour Appellate Tribunal against this award and the Labour Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal on 15-4-1955 on the ground that no substantial question of law arose in the cases; It agreed with the view of the Adjudicator that Section 79, Factories Ac...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Banaras Ice Factory Ltd., ... vs The U.P. Government And Ors.
Judges: Mootham, Agarwala
16 January, 1956·The dispute with regard to bonus for the year 1949 was referred by the State Government to the State Industrial Tribunal which, on 28-11-1952 made a similar award. The company appealed to the Labour Appellate Tribunal from the award of the Adjudicator but that appeal was dismissed on 29-9-1953. The ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kasim Bhai vs State
Judges: Asthana
13 January, 1956·"(1) That you on or about the 19th day of May 1953 at Bharthana were found in possession of Schedule H Drugs stocked for the purpose of sale without having a qualified man under whose supervision sale of such drugs could be done, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 27 of the Dr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Daroupadi Debi And Anr. vs S.K. Dutt And Anr.
Judges: R Dayal, B M Lall
13 January, 1956·5. The present suit is the third suit in the series and has ended so far in favour of the plaintiffs, inasmuch as it has been held that the plaintiffs are entitled to claim the right of privacy if infringed by the defendants' new constructions. 6. Two points have been urged in appeal. One is that no...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of Uttar Pradesh vs N.K. Govil (Happy India Insurance ...
Judges: Mehrotra, Sahai
12 January, 1956·1. The opposite party was tried by the City Magistrate of Allahabad under Section 16 of the Uttar Pradesh Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1947. The magistrate quashed the proceedings and ordered the complaint to be consigned on the ground that the cognizance of the case was taken after six ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mukand Singh vs Vishnu Prasad And Anr.
Judges: Asthana
10 January, 1956·5. It has not been disputed before me that opposite party No. 1, Sri Vishnu Prasad, was removeable from his office only by the State Government, and, as such, Section 197 will be applicable to his case if the other conditions laid down In that section were satisfied. So far as opposite party No. 2, ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cotton Spinning And Weaving Mills ... vs Govt. Of State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: Mootham, Agarwala
05 January, 1956·In Writ Petition No. 339 of 1952 (out of which arises Apneal No. 205 of 1954) the petitioner challenged the validity of the order of the Labour Appellate Tribunal dated the 15th January, 1952, and prayed that it be quashed by the issue of writ of certiorari. 4. The learned Judge was of opinion that ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd. Mohsin And Anr. vs Kausar Raza And Ors.
Judges: Kidwai, H Chaturvedi
05 January, 1956·(c) On payment of what amount, if any, are the plaintiffs entitled to recover possession of the property in suit? 7. Are defendants estopped from denying the rights of Jawad Husain to mortgage the entire 10 annas share? 8. (a) Did Rashid Husain consent to the mortgage deed executed by Jawad Husain i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd. Jalil And Anr. vs The State
Judges: Asthana
04 January, 1956·Both the driver and the conductor were prosecuted under Section 123, Motor Vehicles Act for carrying passengers in excess of the prescribed limit. They were both convicted and Mohammad Jalil was sentenced to a fine of Rs. 25/- and Ram Lakhan to a fine of Rs. 10/-. They filed a revision against their...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.