Shamshul Hasan vs State Of Uttar Pradesh
Judges: Desai
17 February, 1956·The provisional legislature became defunct on 9-5-1952 and a newly elected legislature came into existence in its place. It was contended that the power conferred by the Act upon the State Government to make rules came to an end when the provisional legislature that had passed the Act became defunct...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hanuman Dass vs Pirthvi Nath And Ors.
Judges: Mootham, Agarwala
13 February, 1956·6. The learned Judge has stated in his order that counsel engaged by the respondents is an eminent local lawyer whose professional business is such as to entail' the filing of between three hundred and four hundred applications in a month; that it is not possible for counsel in such circumstances to...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Khubi Ram Brij Kumar vs Sales Tax Officer, Ghaziabad
Judges: Mootham, Agarwala
09 February, 1956·(a) outside the State; or (b) in the course of the import of the goods into, or export of the goods out of, the territory of India. Explanation:-- For the purposes of Sub-clause (a), a sale or purchase shall be deemed to have taken place in the State in which the goods have actually been delivered a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hiralal Barman And Ors. vs Sub-Divisional Officer, Hathras ...
Judges: Mootham, Mehrotra, Agarwala, Chaturvedi
09 February, 1956·Out of these instalments agreed by the Mills to be paid, two instalments of Rs. 10,000/- each Were paid towards the arrears. The Sales Tax Department only issued a certificate of the sales tax for realisation of arrears and it is not for the Sales Tax Department to attach any property. It is admitte...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lal Dharam Mirat Singh And Anr. vs Kuar Man Singh And Anr.
Judges: Kidwai, H Chaturvedi
08 February, 1956·2. The decree of this Court was passed on 31-10-1954, and a certificate granting leave to appeal was issued on 10-10-1955. Under Order 45, Rule 7, C. P. C., the petitioner was required to furnish security in cash or in Government securities for the costs of the respondents and also to deposit the su...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Laljit Singh And Ors. vs Pyarelal And Ors.
Judges: Mootham, Agarwala
08 February, 1956·The record was therefore sent to another member of the Board namely Sri T. N. Srivastava for concurrence. Sri T. N. Srivastava considered that he should hear the parties before recording his concurrence and so he sent notices to the parties and fixed 17-2-1954 for the purpose. On that date it so hap...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdul Shakur And Ors. vs Kotwaleshwar Prasad And Ors.
Judges: Agarwala, Desai, V Bhargava
08 February, 1956·Apart from this fact, any judgment can be challenged by anyone including a party to a suit on the basis of fraud or collusion by virtue of Section 44, Evidence Act and it is usually only under these circumstances that even an insolvency Court goes behind a judgment or a decree. The Courts of Bankrup...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jagdish Chandra Bhasin vs State Of Uttar Pradesh
Judges: R Singh
08 February, 1956·2. It appears that the petitioner was an Inspector of Shops and Commercial Establishments in the employ of the opposite party in 1950. Complaints were received against the applicant of corruption and a trap was laid for the detection of the crime. As a sequel to the trap laid, the applicant was pros...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ch. Moinuddin vs Deputy Director Military Lands ...
Judges: Agarwala, V Bhargava
08 February, 1956·4. Only two points have been pressed before us by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the rest have not been pressed. These points are (1) that tho Government Premises (Eviction) Act is invalid because it is beyond the legislative competence of the Union Government, and reference is made to e...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shafiq Ahmad vs Senior Supdt., Post Offices And ...
Judges: Mootham, Agarwala
07 February, 1956·3. In the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents the termination of the services of the appellant was sought to be justified not under Rule 5, but under Rule 6 which is in the following terms : "The service of a Government servant in. quasi-permanent service shall be liable to terminat...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.