Ram Krishna Murarji vs Ratan Chand And Anr.
Judges: B M Lall
14 March, 1955·5. Although the appellant had put forward the claim in the alternative as aforesaid, it was agreed between the parties at the time of hearing that the deposit in question formed part of the assets left by Sm. Godavari and Sri Niwas was, therefore, the owner thereof. He was appearing as the legal rep...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sahu Jagdish Prasad vs Pandit Shreedharpant And Ors.
Judges: Agarwala, Sahai
07 March, 1955·3. In this appeal we have, therefore, to see whether the transfer in favour of the appellant's predecessor-in-interest could be justified on the ground of legal necessity or, as it has been argued as being for the benefit of the estate with regard to the whole of it or any part thereof; and whether,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Charan And Ors. vs Debi Dayal Dubey
Judges: Desai, Beg
04 March, 1955·5. In the rejoinder one of the applicants averred that the counter-affidavit does not contain facts, that the opposite party definitely intended to defy the injunction order and to expedite the construction before the injunction order was made absolute and that a summary of the injunction order was ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Triloki Singh vs Returning Officer, Lucknow And ...
Judges: Kidwai
04 March, 1955·It was further held that the word "election" as used in that Article is wide enough to cover" every part of the process of selection of a representative. It was, therefore, held that this Court could not issue a writ in the matter of the proper or improper rejection of a nomination paper. 4. It is t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Narayan Singh vs Smt. Bahadur Kunwar
Judges: Agarwala, Sahai
03 March, 1955·The stump required on the sale deed and the deed of release was of the value of Rs. 403/2/-. The Treasury supplied the stamp in ten sheets. Seven sheets were used up in writing out the contents of the documents. Three sheets remained. They were utilised by defacing the stamp with a cross and by the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jiwan Mal & Co. vs Secretary, Kanpur Loha Mills ...
Judges: R Dayal, V Bhargava
02 March, 1955·4. The contention for the petitioner is met for the opposite parties on the ground that Section 3, Sub-section (2) of the Act provides that draft standing orders should conform, as far as practicable, to the model standing orders whenever model standing orders have been prescribed and that in case t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Badhyamal Narayan Das vs Chairman, District Board, ...
Judges: Mehrotra
02 March, 1955·No counter-affidavit has been filed challenging the facts set out in the affidavit filed in support of the -petition and no attempt has been made on behalf of the Board to prove that the fee is enough to meet the expenses which the Board has to incur for the purpose of granting licence and realising...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahabir Prasad vs District Magistrate, Kanpur And ...
Judges: Mootham, B M Lall
01 March, 1955·"It seems to me that true position is that when the law under which the authority is making a decision itself requires a judicial approach, the decision will be quasi-judicial." Fazl Ali J. expressed himself on p. 228 as follows: "It may be safely laid down that an order will be a judicial or quasi-...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.