Firm Raghubar Dayal Kallu Mal vs State Of U.P., Lucknow And Ors.
Judges: Chowdhry
29 July, 1955·Clauses (b) and (c) both apply to cases where goods are imported in Uttar Pradesh, but whereas the former applies to the case where the import takes place as a direct result of sale, the latter applies to the case where the import is otherwise than as a direct result of' a sale. It was pleaded in th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Teja Singh Soorma vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr.
Judges: R Dayal, V Bhargava
28 July, 1955·The opposite parties supported the arbitrator's conduct and the learned "Civil Judge held that the arbitrator was justified in demanding his fees, that the amount of fees was not exorbitant but was reasonable and that the arbitrator could demand payment of his fees before proceeding further with the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dwijendra Datt Saklani vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Mehrotra
28 July, 1955·Thereafter he was transferred to Allahabad as Chief Food Grains Inspector and by a letter dated 19-5-1953, from the Regional Food Controller, Kanpur Region, he was demoted to the rank of Food Grains Inspector in the scale of Rs. 85-5-160. No opportunity was given to the petitioner to show cause agai...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd. Ismail vs Abdul Rashid And Ors.
Judges: Agarwala, Desai, V Bhargava
27 July, 1955·The seeond condition is that he must make known his intention to pre-empt 'without delay by making the two demands which are technically called 'Talab Mawasibat, or immediate claim and 'Talab Ishhad' or claim by confirmation before witnesses. The Talab Mawasibat is made immediately when the pre-empt...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Chander Roy vs University Of Allahabad And Ors.
Judges: V Bhargava, Mehrotra
27 July, 1955·Similarly, in -- 'Dwarka Prasad Laxmi Narain v. State of Uttar Pradesh', AIR 1954 SC 224 (B), their Lordships of the Supreme Court considered the validity of various provisions of the U. P. Coal Control Order, 1953. Their Lordships first dealt with the validity of Clause 3(1) of the U. P. Coal Contr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd. Rasool vs Mst. Rabbo And Anr.
Judges: Mulla
26 July, 1955·5. The counsel for the applicant before me has urged two grounds. Firstly, it was contested that Mohammad Rasul did not reside with Shrimati Rabbo at Lucknow and the trial court has erred in evaluating the evidence on that point. This question has been concluded by the findings of fact and I am not ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sardool Singh Mann (S.) vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors.
Judges: Mehrotra
25 July, 1955·6. In order to appreciate the points raised By the applicant it is necessary to refer to the charges framed against him. The first charge was that he recovered two spears from the house of one Pooran Lohar, resident of village Shal, police station Nojhil, after his house search and obtained Rs. 300 ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Oudh Behari Singh vs Gajadhar Jaipuriya And Ors.
Judges: R Dayal, Kidwai
22 July, 1955·7. The second question already mentioned is with respect to what was pleaded in para. 3 of the written statement of Gajadhar Jaipuriya, defendant 1. It is necessary to reproduce it in order to indicate the true import of the contention for the defendant specially when the point urged before us is no...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jokhi Ram And Anr. vs Sardar Singh And Ors.
Judges: Mootham, Agarwala
22 July, 1955·That suit was decreed. It was held that the property was joint, that Sheo Baran Singh was not entitled to make a gift of it, that the guardians appointed in the suit of 1925 were negligent and that the decree and sale in the execution proceedings of that decree were not binding on the plaintiffs. 8....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nagoo And Anr. vs Pt. Shiv Dularey Dixit And Ors.
Judges: Mootham, Agarwala
21 July, 1955·Dated 19th August, 1942." Therefore a decree in terms of the compromise was passed. 2. The plaintiffs of that suit paid one instalment according to the terms of the compromise but failed to pay the second instalment in time. We are told that the amount of the second instalment was ultimately deposit...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.