Inderchand Hari Ram vs Commr. Of Income-Tax
Judges: Malik, V Bhargava
31 March, 1953·In spite of these notifications the assessee continued to maintain the selling agency office at Kanpur and incurred expenditure thereon. In the assessment year 1946-47, for which the relevant account period was 1-10-1944, to 30-9-1945, the assessee returned an income of Rs. 78,425/- from the managin...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Laxmi Devi Sugar Mills vs The Labour Appellate Tribunal Of ...
Judges: C Agarwala, M Chaturvedi
30 March, 1953·3. At this time an appeal was pending before the Labour Appellate Tribunal in connection with another dispute between the management and some workmen. The management applied under Section 22 of the Industrial Disputes (Appellate Tribunal) Act of 1950 for permission to dismiss the 76 workmen. This ap...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Baijnath Das vs Mahant Ramdeo Das Chela Mahant ...
Judges: Malik, Gurtu
24 March, 1953·The appellant has filed this appeal against that order and on behalf of the respondent a preliminary objection has been raised that no appeal lies. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant has, however, relied on Section 299 of Indian Succession Act and has urged that every order passed by a District Ju...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sm. Daljit Kaur, B.A., B.T. vs S. Tarlok Singh And Ors.
Judges: Malik, Gurtu
24 March, 1953·"Every order made by a District Judge by virtue of the powers hereby conferred upon him shall be subject to appeal to the High Court in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), applicable to appeals." Section 299 is in Part IX of the Act which deals with Proba...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sheo Kumar And Anr. vs V.G. Oak And Ors.
Judges: Sapru, Chaturvedi
19 March, 1953·Clearly a wide definition had to be given to the word "candidate" as the object appears to have been to prevent corrupt or improper practices. The words "at any election" in Section 79, would in cases in which an actual election takes place, have reference to the exact time when the polling takes pl...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
V.G. Deshpandey vs City Magistrate, Lucknow And Ors.
Judges: Malik, H Shankar
17 March, 1953·1. This is an application under Articles 226 and 228 of the Constitution for an order that the case against the applicant before the Judicial Officer, Lucknow, be withdrawn and disposed of by this Court and that the proceedings in the lower Court be stayed. 2. Learned counsel has urged that in view ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Panchaiti Akhara vs Babu Nem Chandra And Ors.
Judges: Sapru, Chaturvedi
17 March, 1953·6. The first point raised by the learned counsel need not detain us because it appears that the appellant had not pursued his allegation that the partition effected by the compromise decree was a fraudulent and collusive transaction. There is no mention of this point in the judgment of the first cou...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gulab Singh And Ors. vs Collector Of Farrukhabad And Ors.
Judges: S Saran, Gurtu
16 March, 1953·"With reference to your notice No. 739, dated 4-6-1951 for settlement of the plots Nos. 54/1, 609/1 of village Uncha within fifteen days I bag to inform you that the notice was received here in the office on 8-6-1951 by the sectional clerk and mukhtar-i-am of the office who unfortunately detained th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dwarka Prasad Agarwal vs Krishna Chandra And Ors.
Judges: R Dayal, Chaturvedi
16 March, 1953·8. Criminal prosecutions, except where there are statutory provisions to the contrary, may be commenced at any time after the commissions of the offence. A prosecution is commenced, when an information is laid before a justice, or the accused is brought before him to answer the charge, or when an in...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hazari Lal vs Kanhaiya Lal
Judges: Malik, V Bhargava
13 March, 1953·3. The suit was contested on various grounds and one of the grounds, we are informed by learned counsel, was that the notice for ejectment was defective. 4. On 21-7-1948, the suit was dismissed as the notice for ejectment served on the defendant was found to be not in accordance with law. 5. An appe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.