Dharam Karan Bahadur Asaf Jahi And ... vs Sm. Shahzad Kunwar And Ors.
Judges: S Saran, Kaul
29 November, 1952·11. On the line of claim based on the right of Shebaitship, the learned Judge was of opinion that a vivified idol cannot be the subject of a will or gift like moveable property. He was, however, of opinion that by the deed of gift dated 25-2-1869, Rani Mata Bibi, the founder of the temple, constitut...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Suraj Mal vs The Board Of Revenue, U.P., ...
Judges: S Saran, B B Prasad, Kaul
29 November, 1952·(a) provisions inconsistent with anything in this Act, so far as the inconsistency extends; (b) provisions applicable, only to special suits or proceedings outside the scope of this Act; and (c) the provisions contained in List I of the Second Schedule, shall apply to all suits and other proceedings...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raghunath Narain Mathur vs Union Of India (Uoi)
Judges: Sapru, Chaturvedi
28 November, 1952·1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution which has been presented to this Court by a Railway clerk who has been given notice by the Railway authorities that he will have to retire on the attainment of 55 years of ago. 2. Now, our attention has been drawn to a recent change in ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahabir Prasad vs Kewal Krishna And Ors.
Judges: B M Lall
27 November, 1952·2. It appears that the appellant was the tenant of a house. One Gaya Prasad made an application to the House Allotment Officer of Kanpur praying that the house which was in the occupation of the appellant be allotted to him. On that petition the appellant made an endorsement to the effect that he wo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Banarsi Stores vs President Of The Union Of Indian ...
Judges: V Bhargava, Chaturvedi
26 November, 1952·1. Whether the consignment in suit consisted of goods excepted within the meaning of Section 75, Railways Act; if so, what is its effect ? 2. Whether the goods in dispute were consigned with the defendant in risk-note form x; if so, what is its effect ? 3. Whether the consignment in suit was not del...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gauri Shankar And Sons vs Union Of India (Uoi) (General ...
Judges: S Saran, B M Lall
21 November, 1952·3. Before filing the written statement the respondent moved the learned Civil Judge to stay the proceedings under Section 34, Arbitration Act. It is common ground between the parties that para 65 of the publication entitled ''The Specifications, Instructions and General Conditions of Contract" is ap...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Calcutta National Bank Ltd. vs Rahmat Ali Fateh Ullah
Judges: S Saran, B B Prasad
20 November, 1952·"Where any claim is preferred to property attached before judgment, such claim shall be investigated in the manner hereinbefore provided for the investigation of claims to property attached in execution of a decree for the payment of money." 5. In the Full Bench case of -- 'Mallikharjuna Prasada Nai...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Ram Kali vs Pahilwan Singh And Ors.
Judges: V Bhargava
20 November, 1952·3. The trial Court decreed the suit 'in toto' but the lower appellate Court modified the decree and granted a decree in respect of only half share in the property on the ground that the plaintiff-respondent, Shrimati Javitri, had made a statement that she did not want any decree in her favour. It is...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Makhan Lal Jain And Anr. vs The Amrit Banaspati Co. Ltd. And ...
Judges: B M Lall
19 November, 1952·(i) has obtained the consent in writing of not less than one hundred in number of the members of the company or not less than one-tenth in number of the members, whichever is less, or (ii) holds not less than one-tenth of the issued share capital of the company upon which all calls and other sums du...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bijadhar Ram Dwarka Ram Ballia, In ... vs Unknown
Judges:
19 November, 1952·"Whether there is any change in the person carrying on the business within the meaning of Section 8(I) of the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940, when the business which was previously carried on and owned by a Hindu undivided family is on partial partition of the family carried on and owned by a partners...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.