Ram Prasad And Ors. vs State, Through Jai Narain And Anr.
Judges: B M Lall
27 May, 1952·2a. The defence was that the building in question was not a temple but a private house which had been sold two days before by Shrimati Bibbo (the mother of one of the accused, viz. Gutti) to the wife of another accused, Earn Vinod, and the, purchasers had, in lawful exercise of their civil right, en...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lal Behari And Ors. vs State Through The Special ...
Judges: P Bhargava, Beg
26 May, 1952·5. In view of the fact that the main grounds of the transfer of the two cases are the same as those which have been made the basis of the application for contempt of Court, it would be convenient to take up the application, for contempt of Court first. 6. The offence of contempt of Court has not bee...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Nath And Ors. vs The State
Judges: Beg
23 May, 1952·2. The defence of the accused was that the shop belonged to them, that the rent receipts of the shop were in the name of Ramnath and they were asserting their own rights in bona fide manner and were not guiity of any offence. 3. The story narrated by the complainant P. W. 1 Mathura was corroborated ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Governor General In Council And ... vs Mahabir Ram And Anr.
Judges: Waliullah, B B Prasad, Gurtu
14 May, 1952·"We the undersigned do hereby agree and undertake" to hold the said Railway Administration over whose railway the said goods may be carried in transit from Canning-25 Station to Dohrighat Station harmless and free from all responsibility for the condition in which the aforesaid goods may be delivere...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Sarup vs Sm. Gayatri Devi And Anr.
Judges: M Ahmad
14 May, 1952·7. The lower appellate Court affirmed this decree on the same findings. 8. Mr. B.L. Gupta, learned counsel for the defendant-appellant, has contended before me (1) that the findings of the Courts below with regard to the defendants' wilful default cannot be legally sustained, (2) that the plaintiff ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sridhar Upadhya vs Lakshmi Prasad
Judges: M Ahmad
09 May, 1952·6. Learned counsel for the decree-holders has challenged the findings of the lower appellate Court as erroneous. In anticipation of an argument to that effect by the judgment-debtor ho contended that the finding against the decree-holders' good faith within the meaning of Section 14, Limitation Act,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pratap Singh vs Commr. Of Income-Tax
Judges: Malik, V Bhargava
02 May, 1952·"As regards the proposed alteration, we think that it is not necessary as the matter has been fully brought out and discussed in the Statement of the Case and the question formulated by the Tribunal is, of course, subject to the facts stated, and findings arrived at. by the tribunal. The suggestion ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Anand Behari Lal vs Commr. Of Income-Tax
Judges: Malik, V Bhargava
02 May, 1952·(2) Whether the sum of Rs. 19,123 on account of expenses incurred by the assessee in financing the litigation in pursuance of the aforesaid agreement is a permissible deduction under Section 10(2) (XV), Income-tax Act? 2. The facts that appear from the statement of the case are as follows. 3. One Mo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.