Bhagwan Din vs Ram Das And Ors.
Judges: Malik, P Bhargava
21 April, 1952·2. The only question for decision in the case is whether the plaintiffs are entitled to claim the property and the decision of that question will depend on the interpretation of Sections 36 and 37, U. P. Tenancy Act, XVII of 1939. If Section 37 is applicable, the plaintiffs have clearly no case. If,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mst. Jaini And Ors. vs Ram Prasad
Judges: Malik, P Bhargava
21 April, 1952·It is admitted that at the time of his death in 1923 Bhau was a statutory tenant. The widow was, therefore, entitled to remain in occupation of the property for a period of five years from Bhau's death. Under Section 48, Oudh Rent Act, as amended by Act IV [4] of 1921, the widow remain- ed in posses...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd. Ishaq And Anr. vs Administrator Municipality Of ...
Judges: Malik, V Bhargava
18 April, 1952·3. Among other pleas taken in defence the Board pleaded that the suit was not maintainable in the civil court by reason of the provisions of Section 326 of the U. P. Municipalities Act (NO. if [2] of 1916). In the oral pleadings the pleader appearing for the Municipal Board stated that the validity ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Charan Lal vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh
Judges: Sapru, Agarwala
18 April, 1952·2. The petitioner is the owner of plots Nos. 11 and 10 Minjumla measuring 0.933 acres of a garden land in Mohalla Dewan Daya Ram, Gorakhpur city. The U. P. Government published Notification No. 4221/XI-4 M-49, dated 28-6-1949 under Section 4(1), Land Acquisition Act, to the effect that 0.225 acres o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Satya Narain And Ors. vs The State
Judges: Desai, S Saran, M Ahmad
17 April, 1952·21. The evidence against the appellants in this case consists of identifications and recovery of property from the possession of some of them. The question which really needs to be considered is whether the evidence of the witnesses who identified the various appellants as having participated in the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
G.P. Singh vs The Faculty Of Law, University Of ...
Judges: R Dayal, Agarwala
15 April, 1952·It is not disputed that the thesis submitted by the applicant has not been approved by the Faculty of Law or by a sub-Committee thereof. The three examiners appointed to examine the thesis cannot be deemed to be a Sub-Committee of the Faculty of Law, as all the three examiners were not members of th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ganesh Das Ram Gopal vs The Government Of The State Of ...
Judges: B B Prasad, Beg
15 April, 1952·7. Coming to the second point, learned Additional Standing Counsel brought to our notice the fact that when the charge was served upon Ramdeo he submitted his explanation to the applicant denying the charges. On 1-2-1951 the applicant sent the following reply : "Your reply dated 15-1-1951, to our ch...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdur Rashid Khan And Ors. vs The State
Judges: Kidwai
14 April, 1952·1. At about 5 P.M., on 25-3-1951, an incident took place as a result of the cutting of the breach of tamarind tree which resulted in injuries being caused to Suleman. A report was made of the incident the next day at the kotwali Eae Bareli. After investigations the applicants and eight other persons...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pt. Chandi Prasad vs Pt. Sadanand Pathak And Ors.
Judges: M Ahmad
04 April, 1952·8. The execution Court, holding that the final order was really the order of the Munsarim, of 16-10-1941, disallowed the objection of the judgment-debtors, although at the same time it refused to allow the decree-holder to amend his application claiming an exclusion of the period during which Ram Na...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Karam Chand Thapar & Bros. Ltd. vs Dr. Vijay Anand And Ors.
Judges: B B Prasad, Gurtu
02 April, 1952·(a) That the order is arbitrary and mala fide. (b) That as the Additional District Magistrate did not act reasonably in granting permission to the Maharajkumar, there was, in the eye of law, no exercise of discretion. Secondly, it is contended that Section 3 of the Act is ultra vires for the followi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.