Imami vs Daya Ram And Ors.
Judges: R Dayal
06 August, 1951·2. After the jurisdiction of the Panchayati Adalat had been cancelled the Additional District Magistrate sent this case back to Sri Narhar Singh but later, on an application by the accused, he transferred the case to the Court of Sri Har Narain. 3. This is an application praying for the transfer of ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Deep Narain And Anr. vs Bhagauti Din And Anr.
Judges: Agarwala
03 August, 1951·2. The defence to the suit was that the suit was barred by limitation as it was filed more than three years after the date of the pronote. 3. Both the Courts below have held that the suit was not barred by limitation. The reasonings of the two Courts below are, however, different. According to the t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sri Babu Lal vs B. Ganga Saran
Judges: Agarwala
03 August, 1951·2. The Munsif rejected the defendant's pleas and decreed the suit. The lower appellate Court has confirmed that decree. 3. In this second appeal three points have been urged before me. It has been urged that the permission obtained by the plaintiff-respondent for the ejectment of the appellant was i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sheo Dayal And Ors. vs State
Judges: Desai
02 August, 1951·1. This is an application by Sheo Dayal, etc. questioning the legality of their conviction under Section 323, Penal Code by a First Class Magistrate. They were prosecuted under Section 325, Penal Code, but the learned Magistrate framed a charge under Section 323, Penal Code only against them. He con...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Employers' Association Of ... vs The Secretary For Labour, Uttar ...
Judges: M Ahmad, V Bhargava
02 August, 1951·It is undisputed that the manufacturing process in a sugar factory is carried on only daring the crushing season which is also the period during which the factory employees 500 or more workers. Under the first portion defining a 'factory,' the premises would be a 'factory' only for the period during...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Administrator General vs The General Manager, E.I. Railway
Judges: M Ahmad, V Bhargava
01 August, 1951·1. This is an application by the Administrator General of Uttar Pradesh for issue of a writ of mandamus directing the opposite party, the General Manager, East Indian Railway, Calcutta to pay the sum of Rs. 14,240-6-0 to the applicant. The applicant in his affidavit alleges that this sum is included...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sultan Singh Jain vs The State
Judges: Malik, R Dayal, B B Prasad
01 August, 1951·It has been held in the case of Ummal Hasanath, In re, A.I.R. (34) 1947 Mad. 483, in Madho Rao v. Iswardas Sheoratan, A. I. R. (36) 1949 Nag 334 and in Rajkumar Singh v. State, A.I.R. (38) 1951 Madh. B. 28, that in cases to which Section 540A, Cr. P. C. does not apply the Court can exercise its inhe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nahar Singh vs Tek Chand And Anr.
Judges: M Ahmad, V Bhargava
01 August, 1951·3. Balloo Mul, defendant 2, sold his decree to the father of defendant l, appellant. The appellant's father then purchased the property on 4 4-1936 by putting the same to sale. Then the suit giving rise to the present appeal was filed on 2-10-1945. This relief for possession was claimed on the groun...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.