S. Jawad Ali Shah vs Commissioner Of Income Tax
Judges: Malik, Seth
10 October, 1949·6. On an application to state a case, the members of the Tribunal at first framed only one question for reference to us in these terms: "Whether 1/10th of the income derived from agriculture and appropriated by the appellant for his personal use continued to be agricultural income and as such exempt...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rex Through Manzoor Hasan vs Mohd. Ilyas
Judges: H Chandra
10 October, 1949·3. The next point raised on behalf of the applicant is that the learned Magistrate was once seen shopping at Delhi during the course of the hearing of this case in the company of one Shri Krishna Gopal Rastogi, advocate, and that when he saw the applicant he made a remark to the said advocate that t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raghunath Das vs Sri Kishan
Judges: Seth
07 October, 1949·2. The decrees under execution were obtained on 31st August 1929. The last application for execution was made in 1943 more than 12 years after the date of the decree. Limitation was, however, sought to be extended by relying on the Temporary Postponement of Execution of Decrees Act (U. P. Act X [10]...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Benares Hindu University vs Gauri Dutt Joshi
Judges: Malik, W Ullah
07 October, 1949·5. The application for letters of administration was dismissed by the learned single Judge on the ground that the Benares Hindu University was an association of individuals and Section 236, Succession Act, therefore, was a bar to the grant of letters of administration to the Benares Hindu University...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Gopal vs Dr. Baikunth Nath Sharma
Judges: Malik, W Ullah
07 October, 1949·It is not disputed that the property transferred did admit of physical possession. As a matter of fact, there is a finding of fact recorded by both the Courts below that physical possession of the plots was taken by the vendee on 30th March 1943. 3. In the sale-deed it is mentioned that delivery of ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Municipal Board vs B. Mangli Lal
Judges: Malik, W Ullah
07 October, 1949·7. Mr. Jagdish Swarup on behalf of the plaintiff respondent has argued that this finding of the lower appellate Court suffered from two defects. Firstly, that the Executive Officer had been warned by a letter sent by the plaintiff soon after the incident giving the Executive Officer a correct versio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sm. Indra Devi vs B. Pirag Nath
Judges: W Ullah, S Saran
06 October, 1949·The decree-holder applied for execution of this decree. On notice being issued to the judgment-debtor objection was raised to the effect that Section 260, Civil P. C. (Order 21, Rule 33 of the present Code) was inapplicable to the decree in question. This objection was overruled and the judgment-deb...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kalyan Mal Budhulal, Cawnpore, In ... vs Unknown
Judges:
06 October, 1949·"Whether on the findings of fact recorded in the Tribunals order, the sum of Rs. 12,417 is income, profits and gains arising out of carrying on trade or adventure in the nature of trade within the meaning of section 2(4) of the Indian Income-tax ?" The assessee firm deals on wholesale basis in cloth...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.