Majeed Khan Mohammad Yaseen Khan ... vs Rex
Judges: M Ahmad
28 June, 1949·4. The learned Sessions Judge pointed out that the only evidence in the case, so far as the identification of the appellants was concerned, was that of Dwarka Prasad. He disbelieved even this single witness on the ground that his evidence in Court had gone far beyond the simple version which he had ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sir Gulab Singh vs District Magistrate
Judges: W U C J, Sapru, B B Prasad
24 June, 1949·Provided that, notwithstanding anything in para. (b) or para. (c) of this section, effect shall, as nearly as may be continued to be given to the provisions of any such agreement as is therein referred to which relate to customs, transit and communications posts and telegraphs, or other like matters...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Madho Das vs Rex, Through Adya Prasad
Judges: Seth
22 June, 1949·3. Adya Prasad, claiming to be a pairokar of Maharaj Bahadur Singh, applied to the City Magistrate of Banaras on 2fith October 1948 for an order directing Madho Das to vacate the house so that the notice issued by the Municipal Board might be complied with. The case was transferred to a Bench of Hon...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Madho Das vs Rex
Judges:
22 June, 1949·2. By a notice dated 23rd October 1948 issued under Section 263 (1) (a), Municipalities Act Maharaj Bahadur Singh as owner of house No. K25/27 was directed to make certain constructions or to demolish certain portion of that house on the ground that that portion of the house had become dangerous to ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Taqi Mirza vs Rex
Judges:
20 June, 1949·3. The allegations in the said report were that, when Chhotelal, after supplying milk, was returning from Muthiganj to his house and hail reached a place known as the "Tuta Puff" (damaged culvert) in Mohalla Nai Basti, two Muslims, both aged 18 years, surrounded him, that one of them, namely the app...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Binod Behari Lal And Anr. vs Rex
Judges: Malik
08 June, 1949·Learned counsel for the applicants has urged that there was no notification issued by the controller as required by this clause and the previous notification dated 10th October 1942, issued in pursuance of Clause 5, Sugar Control Order, 1942, must be deemed to have lapsed after the Sugar Control Ord...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.