Kunwar Shri Krishna Alias Lad ... vs Brahma Swarup And Ors.
Judges:
27 October, 1944·ORDER Mulla, J. 1. This is an application in revision arising out of a proceeding in execution of a decree for arrears of profits. The applicant, Kunwar Shri Krishna, is the judgment-debtor. It appears that he is the lambardar of a mahal in which the opposite parties, Brahma Swarup and others are co...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raja Suryapal Singh vs Wahid Ali
Judges:
25 October, 1944·A decree for arrears of rent against a tenant other than a permanent tenure holder or fixed rate tenant may, in addition to any other mode of execution, be executed by the ejectment of the tenant from the holding in respect of which the decree was passed. The judgment debtor's objection was that und...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Haji Mohammad Obed Ullah Khan vs Kunwar Mohammad Abdul Jalil Khan ...
Judges:
24 October, 1944·7. The defendants have filed a written statement in which they have pleaded that the decision in Suit No. 44 of 1917 operated as res judicata and that the plaintiff had no right to bring a second suit for the same relief as in Suit No. 44 of 1917 and on the same cause of action. The defendants furth...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Baij Nath Sahai vs Seth Parbin Singh And Anr.
Judges:
24 October, 1944·3. Clause (b) of this sub-section originally provided as follows: If all the joint debtors have not applied under Section 4 the creditor shall have a right to recover from the debtors who have not applied only such amount on account of the joint debt as may be decreed by the Special Judge to be due ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Radhey Shiam vs R.C. Bhattiya
Judges:
20 October, 1944·1. These two revisions arise out of two suits filed by cosharers for profits pertaining to their share. The cases were triable by the Assistant Collector, First Class, Bareilly. I am informed that the headquarters of the Assistant Collector is at Baherhi, but he fixed these cases for hearing on 14th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M. Hari Prasad Tamta And Anr. vs Mohan Lal Sah
Judges:
12 October, 1944·Their contention is that Brij Jiwan Das was an agriculturist because, although he was assessed to the payment of income-tax in the year 1935-36, that assessment was made on the income of the year 1934-35, and that the question whether he was or was not an agriculturist should not depend upon payment...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Om Prakash And Anr. vs Pt. Radhey Shyam Kathawachak And ...
Judges:
11 October, 1944·4. We do not think there is any force in these contentions. The argument advanced by the learned Counsel is that an advertisement in a paper that the defendants were going to sell the dramas did not mean that, they were selling the copyright but it meant that they were only selling the particular co...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.