Babu Lal vs Mangat Rai
Judges:
16 March, 1944·1. This appeal arises out of a suit in which the plaintiffs claimed a sum of Rs. 7728 from the defendant. It appears that the defendant executed a deed of simple mortgage in favour of the plaintiffs on 5th June 1924 in order to secure an advance of Rs. 3000. The plaintiffs brought a suit on the basi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shyam Lal Gomatwala vs Nand Lal And Ors.
Judges:
14 March, 1944·(b) A declaration that defendant 1 or defendant 3 has no right to proceed with the application for an account and deposit of money in the criminal Court. (c) An injunction restraining defendant 3 (from proceeding?) with his application aforesaid in the criminal Court. All the three defendants filed ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Collector Of Gorakhpur vs Sm. Rani Satya Bhama Kumari
Judges:
13 March, 1944·JUDGMENT Allsop, J. 1. This appeal arises out of a suit by a Hindu woman for a declaration fixing the amount of future maintenance and for payment of a certain sum as past maintenance. The defendant is the Court of Wards representing an estate under its management. The learned Judge allowed a sum of...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ahmad Ali vs Joti Prasad
Judges:
03 March, 1944·ference which were cut down or damaged and in place of which no other trees were left standing. " 25-12-0. The value of pharras, fuel and charcoal not supplied. 2. In suit No. 389 of 1938 the learned Judge allowed the plaintiffs a decree for Rs. 5734-1-9. This sum consists o the following items: Rs....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chhedi Lal vs Babu Nandan
Judges:
03 March, 1944·3. The Munsif held that the deed in question was a mortgage deed and not a sale deed, as alleged by the defendants. He next held that the allegation of the plaintiff that the mortgagee had advanced only Rs. 800 to the mortgagors was not correct and that the mortgage money shown in the deed, viz., Rs...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mehdi Raza vs Bijai Ram
Judges:
02 March, 1944·JUDGMENT Hamilton, J. 1. This is a second appeal by a plaintiff. The plaintiff Mehdi Raza is the successor-in-interest of some person who in the past was given a village with release from the obligation of paying land revenue. It is apparently the case of the plaintiff that his predecessor-in-intere...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.