Babu Balmakund Gupta vs Secretary Of State And Anr.
Judges:
29 January, 1941·2. The Board maintained that the defendant was trespassing on their property, while the defendant took the line of negotiating with the Board for a lease of so much of the ground as the Board said belonged to them. But, in the meantime, the defendant went on putting up his building and it was comple...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mirza Hidayat Beg vs Seth Behari Lal
Judges:
28 January, 1941·7. The problem therefore before us is what was the real intention of the settlor when he executed the deed. Did he intend to make a genuine 'wakf' as the defendants contend or did he intend to make a sham 'wakf' as the plaintiff alleges? There is a third possibility that he created the wakf subject ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Secretary Of State vs Gomti Kunwari And Ors.
Judges:
23 January, 1941·4. In July 1934 an application was made by the Government pleader to the Judge. It was an application, though in terms it did not seem to say so, under Order 33, Rule 12. At any rate, the Judge in the opening words of his judgment appears to have treated it so. It claimed that the amount of the cour...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Inder Bahadur Singh vs Sita Ram And Ors.
Judges:
22 January, 1941·The Judge says that the cause of action against each of the purchasers is a distinct one. The plaintiff claims his share of family property. His cause of action, the right, is his relation to the family to which the property appertains and on this right, if established, and if he is not otherwise ba...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rati Ram vs Niader Mal
Judges:
21 January, 1941·1. This is an application in revision arising out of a second Appeal No. 610 of 1938, in which I made an order on 10th April 1940. The facts are very simple. It seems that a decree was obtained against the applicant by the opposite party for arrears of rent. On 23rd July 1937 a notice, purporting to...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Bibi Ram Piarai vs Daya Shanker
Judges:
20 January, 1941·1. This is a plaintiff's revision under Section 25, Small Cause Courts Act, from a decree dismissing her suit. The suit was for recovery of a sum of money on a bond dated 4th July 1934 which had been executed by the opposite party in favour of the applicant. The applicant had obtained a decree for a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lala Radhey Lal vs Niranjan Nath
Judges:
17 January, 1941·1. This is an application for leave to appeal to His Majesty in Council and has been filed by one Radhey Lal. He had applied to us praying that one Niranjan Nath should be dealt with and punished according to law for contempt of the insolvency Court of Agra. On 2nd October 1940 See A.I.R. 1941 All. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohammad Mohtashim And Anr. vs Joti Prasad
Judges:
17 January, 1941·2. A preliminary objection has been taken that by reason of the failure of the present appellants to file an appeal in the suit for accounts filed by them, the present appeal is incompetent, and reliance is placed on the Full Bench decision of this Court in Zaharai v. Debia ('11) 33 All 51. In reply...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chheda Lal Jain vs Officer, Commanding Station ...
Judges:
15 January, 1941·Whereas it is expedient further to amend and to consolidate the law relating to the provision of house accommodation for military officers in cantonments, it is hereby enacted as follows. 3. It is also not disputed before us that the Act is not a special Act. That being so, the question naturally ar...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sarnath Sanyal Madhusudan Bagchi ... vs Hrishikesh Sanyal
Judges:
03 January, 1941·(a) Are the minors entitled to the maintenance allowance of Rs. 50 per month as provided for in the last will of Sarnath Sanyal dated 13th September 1931? (b) Are the minors entitled to the right of residence as provided for in the said will? and (c) What is the effect of the death of Sukumari Devi ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.