Attar Singh vs Asa Ram
Judges:
12 September, 1939·1. This second appeal arises out of a suit for partition of an enclosure No. 416. Inside this enclosure there are several buildings or sub-divisions Nos. 994 to 1001. The trial Court passed a preliminary decree in favour of the plaintiff. The lower Appellate Court has confirmed the decree except abo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shiam Sunder Lal vs Sarmadi Begam And Ors.
Judges:
12 September, 1939·2. The Court below dismissed both the suits and that is why there are two appeals before us. It is true that the two suits were tried together, but the Court below proceeded to discuss the merits of Suit No. 40 of 1935 first. It was observed that Suit No. 40 of 1935 was filed on 15th October 1935, b...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Anant Rai And Anr. vs Bhagwan Rai And Anr.
Judges:
11 September, 1939·3. The mortgage deed dated 4th January 1929 (item l) was for a sum of Rs. 2300 out of which Rs. 2088 were paid before the Sub-Registrar and Rs. 212 were credited towards two previous sarkhats executed by Kailashpati in favour of the vendees. The sum of Rs. 6000 entered as item 1 was due on account o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sultan Ahmad vs Gauhar Begam
Judges:
11 September, 1939·The lady was called and I sat in the verandah while she was behind the door. I asked the two persons above if she was the executant. They said "Yes." I then addressed her and asked her if she had got the deed written (ki unhon ne likkha hai?). She replied in the affirmative. Then the document was gi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mangal Sen vs Kewal Ram
Judges:
08 September, 1939·3. The appellant alleges that on 20th August 1933 he paid a sum of Rs. 4180 to his brother Joti Prasad, and obtained from him a receipt which he has produced. His contention is that Joti Prasad released the property purchased by the appellant from his security and that the appellant took possession ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chaubey Mangan Lal vs Chaubey Brahm Dutt And Anr.
Judges:
05 September, 1939·2. Before we discuss the evidentiary value of these two documents, it is necessary to refer to certain provisions of the Agra Preemption Act. There is no doubt that on the sale of a share of zamindari if any wajib-ul-arz prepared prior to the commencement of the Act records a custom, contract or dec...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Zamir Ahmad vs Mt. Quamar-Un-Nisa And Ors.
Judges:
05 September, 1939·(a) That it may be established that the document known as the wakfnama, dated 20th July 1929, executed by Sheikh Fazal Ahmad is null and void and illegal and that the plaintiff is entitled to and is the owner of a three-eighth share in the property specified below, and also it may be established tha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohammad Umar vs Abdul Ghani And Anr.
Judges:
04 September, 1939·1. This second appeal arises out of a suit for possession over a house upon the allegation that defendant 1, Mohammad Umar, was the tenant of the plaintiff Abdul Ghani and of defendant 2, Jagat Ram. The fact that Abdul Ghani and Mohammad Umar are related is not denied. Mohammad Umar is the grandson ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Uma Shanker vs Ram Charan
Judges:
01 September, 1939·4. At page 496 they observed: Lala Kanhai Lal was a party to that compromise. Ho was one of those whose claims to the family property, or to shares in it, induced Mt. Ramdei, against her own interests and those of her daughter, Mt. Kirpa, and greatly to her own detriment, to alter her position by ag...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sadiq Ali And Ors. vs Zahida Begam
Judges:
01 September, 1939·Father never mentioned to me about the dower except on the occasion I referred to, viz., early-October 1930, or what provision would be made for the dower. 4. Zahir Alam also has stated: No reason was told us by father why the other relations were wishing upon provision for dower. This was the first...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.