Kirpa Shanker Lal vs Ram Lal And Ors.
Judges:
11 January, 1939·1. This is a plaintiff's second appeal. The plaintiff and the defendants admittedly belong to the same family and they are recorded as co-tenants in certain plots of land constituting an occupancy holding. The plaintiff alleged that for the convenience of cultivation individual plots were separately...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chhedi Lal vs Bharat Tamoli
Judges:
11 January, 1939·An agriculturist debtor may sue for an account of money lent or advanced to or paid for him by any person, or due by him to any person as the price of goods or on a written or unwritten engagement for the payment of money, and of money paid by him to such person. 2. The important word in this Sectio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bansraj Das vs Secretary Of State
Judges:
11 January, 1939·2. The defence of the Secretary of State for India in Council was that the above-mentioned sum was not paid by the plaintiff and therefore he was not entitled to recover it. Further, it was alleged that the attached animals beloged exclusively to Jairaj, the son of the plaintiff, that the payment ma...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Balbhaddar Singh And Anr. vs Raghubir Singh And Ors.
Judges:
10 January, 1939·3. The main ground which learned Counsel for the appellants has argued is not really contained definitely in his grounds of appeal at all. What he has argued is based on certain rulings and is to the effect that the question referred cannot be referred by a Revenue Court under Section 111, Land Reve...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Municipal Board Of Saharanpur vs Jagdish Saran
Judges:
09 January, 1939·4. It further observed that as these carts are exclusively used by the plaintiff himself for cartage of bricks from his brick kiln to the places of his customers inside the Municipality, the Board was not entitled to impose the fee in question. The Court did not record any finding on the question wh...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ganga Saran And Anr. vs Lala Ganeshi Lal And Anr.
Judges:
09 January, 1939·1. This is a plaintiffs' appeal arising out of a suit in which the plaintiffs claimed a declaration that a certain decree (No. 416 of 1929) of the Court of the Munsif of Mahaban is not binding on the plaintiffs and their ancestral property referred to in the plaint. The trial Court dismissed the sui...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M. Aziz Uddin vs Haji Maqbul Hussain
Judges:
09 January, 1939·3. It was further contended by the learned Counsel for the appellant that the case must be decided on the plaintiff's evidence alone and the defendant's evidence should not be looked at because the onus was on the plaintiff. This argument is not sound. There can be no question of any decision on the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Maqbul Husain And Ors. vs Mt. Zain-Un-Nissa Bibi And Ors.
Judges:
06 January, 1939·1. This is an appeal by the plaintiffs. Plaintiffs 1 and 2, Maqbul Husain and Iqbal Husain, are the grandsons of plaintiff 3, Mt. Waliya Bibi. The suit was for the possession of a house and a plot of land and for damages. The trial Court decreed the suit in favour of plaintiffs 1 and 2. On appeal by...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Wiqar Ali Khan vs Narain Das Lala Rahumal
Judges:
06 January, 1939·The value of the subject-matter of the suit exceeded Rs. 10,000, as also did the subject-matter of the proposed appeal; even if the maintenance alone is regarded as in dispute, its value having, regard to the widow's prospects of life, exceeded Rs. 10,000 the Appellate Court did not affirm the decre...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Municipal Board vs Habib Ullah
Judges:
05 January, 1939·1. This is an appeal by the defendant Board in a suit for a perpetual injunction restraining it from demolishing certain constructions of the plaintiff. The suit was dismissed by the trial Court but the lower Appellate Court has decreed it. The plaintiff-respondent applied to the Municipal Board for...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.