Maharaj Ram Bijai Prasad Singh vs Ram Bhanjan Singh
Judges:
21 April, 1939·1. This is a plaintiff's appeal arising out of a suit in which the plaintiff sought to recover from the defendant the Hum of Rs. 55-14-7 on account of revenue alleged to have been realized from him in respect of the defendant's share of revenue for the year 1928, plus Rs. 11-12.0 interest, Rs. 67-10...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Chander vs Kunji Lal
Judges:
20 April, 1939·2. The lower Appellate Court then proceeded to hear the appeal and it heard the appeal with the additional evidence on the record and with the report of the commissioner on the record. It started by saying that in order to succeed the plaintiff must prove that the house in suit was abandoned by the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Noor Mohammad, Lambardar And Ors. vs Lalloo And Ors.
Judges:
19 April, 1939·1. This is a first appeal by a lambardar and 18 other plaintiffs who have brought a suit against 22 defendants. The Court below has held that the suit does not lie in the Civil Court but in the Revenue Court and that therefore the plaint has been returned to the plaintiffs for presentation to the pr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhudeo Prasad vs Sri Nath And Ors.
Judges:
19 April, 1939·In the abovenamed suit the decree-holder has attached and put up for Bale property mentioned below but that property is mortgaged with the petitioner by means of a mortgage without possession dated 16th June 1923 executed by Babu Lal for Rs. 2000 with interest at the rate of Re. 1-8-0 per cent, per ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Asmat Ullah And Ors. vs Mt. Khatun-Unnisa And Ors.
Judges:
19 April, 1939·1. This is a defendants' appeal arising out of a suit for possession of property. The plaintiff is one Mt. Khatununisa and she claims the property as the hair of her deceased husband. As his heir she is entitled to one-eighth of the property. She alleges that she has been in possession of the whole ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rev. Luckman Chaplain vs Pearey Lal
Judges:
19 April, 1939·The other point in the case is one of estoppel. The property was let by the plaintiff to the defendant Ranjit Singh; he was let into possession by the plaintiff's gardener Bhairon on her behalf and by her direction and he regularly paid rent to her and applied to her to do all the necessary repairs;...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mewa Ram vs Municipal Board
Judges:
18 April, 1939·(1) The Board may charge fees to be fixed by bye-law or by public auction or by agreement for the use or occupation (otherwise than under a lease) of any immovable property vested in, or entrusted to the management of, the Board, including any public street or place or on which it allows the use or ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kamlapat Moti Lal In Re. vs Unknown
Judges:
18 April, 1939·"7. The consent of the shareholders to be obtained to the above scheme. "8. In case the shareholders do not accept the scheme, we are willing to purchase the Company at Rs. 11,50,000. (Sd.) KAMLAPAT. (Sd.) RAMAKANT MALAVIYA Vakil for L. Kamlapat. These proposals were in due course put for considerat...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhola Ojha And Anr. vs Dhaneshwar Ojha And Anr.
Judges:
18 April, 1939·1. This is a plaintiffs' application in revision under Section 115, Civil P.O. It arises in the following circumstances. The plaintiffs Bhola Ojha and Deo Narain Singh instituted a suit in the Court of the Munsif of Ballia, claiming possession over a holding of 14 bighas and 16 biswas with a declara...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Ram Kali And Anr. vs Munna Lal And Ors.
Judges:
17 April, 1939·2. This case was followed in Mohidin v. Shivlingappa (1899) 23 Bom. 666. On the principle of the doctrine of lost grant when a right has been exercised by a person or persons for a sufficiently long time openly, uninterruptedly and peaceably it can safely be presumed that it had a legal origin. In D...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.