Baij Nath Sahai vs Man Singh And Anr.
Judges:
05 May, 1938·1. This is a plaintiff's appeal and arises out of a suit for profits filed in the Revenue Court under Section 227, Agra Tenancy Act (Act 3 of 1926). The claim was with respect to 1337 Fasli and the total amount claimed by the plaintiff was a sum of Rs. 570. There were a number of defendants in the s...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Kamni Begam And Anr. vs Emperor
Judges:
05 May, 1938·1. This is an application in revision against an order of the learned Additional District Magistrate of Naini Tal transferring two cases from the Court of a Subdivisions! Magistrate to his own Court. The applicants or one of them, I am told, made a complaint against one Sarwat Yar Khan and as the re...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jugal Kishore Mukat Lal, In Re. vs Unknown
Judges:
05 May, 1938·The facts may be briefly stated. The assessment year in question is 1933-34 and the accounting year is the Sambat year 1989 ending roughly with the financial year 1932-33. The assessees Messrs. Jugal Kishore Mukat Lal of Khurja were assessed up to the assessment year 1932-33 as a joint Hindu family....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Haji Sheikh Wahid-Uddin vs B. Makhan Lal And Anr.
Judges:
04 May, 1938·4. The Court below has held that the plaintiff was an "agriculturist"; that the suit was cognizable by it, but that the transaction in question was a usufructuary mortgage; and that therefore the plaintiff was not a "debtor," and so was not entitled to maintain the suit, as in addition to being an "...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lal Singh Nayal vs Jiwanand And Anr.
Judges:
04 May, 1938·Each decree is prima facie capable of execution against the estate of the deceased testator. In these circumstances, we are of opinion that the two decrees may, without unduly straining the language of Section 73,be regarded as passed against the same judgment-debtor, namely they are both decrees ag...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sheo Prasad Bansal vs Kulsharastra Sabha And Ors.
Judges:
04 May, 1938·2. The learned Judge of the lower Appel. late Court however held that the Sabha had no power under its Rules and Regulations to permit the secretary to create a mortgage. On this point, it appears to me that the view of the learned Judge is quite wrong. The learned Judge admits that the Sabha under ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Narhari Shastri And Ors. vs Pt. Basudeo Namburi
Judges:
03 May, 1938·4. Their Lordships approve of the dictum of Amir Ali J. in Baiju Lal Parbati v. Bulak Lal Pathuk (1897) 24 Cal. 385 at p. 390: The effect of Section 30...is that unless such permission is obtained by the person suing or defending the suit, his action has no binding effect on the persons whom he choo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kanhya Lal vs Maheshwar Narain And Ors.
Judges:
02 May, 1938·1. We have before us a first appeal from order and also a revision against an order of the special Judge of Farrukhabad, dated 9th July 1936, staying proceedings in a suit for specific performance of contract. The suit was instituted on 1st October 1935 and the contract was alleged1 to have been ent...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.