Din Dayal vs Sheo Prasad And Ors.
Judges:
08 March, 1938·When two persons mutually transfer the ownership of one thing for the ownership of another, neither thing or both things being money only, the transaction is called an exchange. 6. It is somewhat late in the day for learned Counsel for the appellant to take up this attitude. When the case first came...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dular Pandey And Anr. vs Nanda Budhai And Anr.
Judges:
08 March, 1938·14. And on p. 969 the Full Bench states that the case before them was governed by Section 6, U.P. General Clauses Act, which laid down the same principle. 15. The argument for the appellant was that Section 24, Tenancy Act of 1926 does not apply because the male tenant died before the Act, and that ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
L. Pirbhu Dayal vs The Jwala Bank
Judges:
08 March, 1938·2. The Court was further influenced by the fact that the plaintiff had admitted in his evidence that the cheque book often remained in the small "baithak" of his house where other persons had also access and that the box containing the cheques remained unlocked in day time. Learned Counsel for the a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jai Narain Lal Tandon And Ors. vs Lala Bechoo Lal And Anr.
Judges:
04 March, 1938·4. The trial Court dismissed the suit on the ground that no consideration had passed; but the lower Appellate Court has reversed the decree of trial Court and has decreed the suit. The learned Judge finds that there was consideration for the mortgage bond in suit, that those defendants who were mino...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Emperor vs Jagannath Prasad Swadhin
Judges:
02 March, 1938·2. A note is appended at the foot of this application the material portion of which is as follows: You are annoyed at me as I am a congress man. I will not attend the Court on the date of hearing unless you assure me of my being out of danger by sending me a verbatim copy of your order allowing this...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Haji Mohammad Saleh Khan vs Bibi Nur Fatma Begam And Anr.
Judges:
02 March, 1938·2. In the plaint it is set out that the Pili Kothi in suit was the property of Yakub Khun and was divided into 78 sihams of which one-third went by a will to Hamida Khatun, the grand-daughter of Yakub, and 13 sihams went to the widow leaving a balance of 39 sihams which were divided into 13 shares, ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdul Rashid And Ors. vs B. Braham Saran
Judges:
01 March, 1938·But the possession of the tenant of the demised close is the possession of his landlord, and it seems to be an utter violation of the first principles of the relation of landlord and tenant to suppose that the tenant, whose occupation of close A was the occupation of his landlord, could by that occu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.