Tilak Ram And Ors. vs Surat Singh And Ors.
Judges:
17 February, 1938·Specification of the receipt of the amount of consideration. Left with the vendees for payment of part of the amount of the hypothecation bond executed by Surat, Singh, etc. registered on 28th September 1920...admitted as being due by us... Rs. 4500. 6. The contention of learned Counsel is that his ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Thakur Kishun Chand Singh vs Munshi Makund Sarup And Ors.
Judges:
14 February, 1938·2. In order to appreciate the argument addressed to me in support of the application it is necessary to state a few facts that led to the revision. Syed Haidar Shah and two others executed a usufructuary mortgage deed in favour of M. Makund Sarup and Maulvi Ghafur Bakhsh on 17th December 1904 in res...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: Ganeshi Lal And Sons, ... vs Unknown
Judges:
14 February, 1938·2. In connexion with case No. 541 of 1936 we are also asked to have the question referred as to whether the rate of 60 per cent, which has been applied for the purpose of estimating the net profits of a particular article of jewellery was justified. The facts are simple enough and are not in dispute...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ganeshi Lal And Sons, Jewellers, ... vs Commissioner Of Income Tax.
Judges:
14 February, 1938·It may be mentioned that in March, 1931, the assessee for the first time valued their stock and prepared a stock book, according to which the total value of the stock in trade was approximately Rs. 14,00,000. The returns submitted by the assessees for the years in dispute showed a loss, but they wer...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gobind Behari And Ors. vs Shujaat-Mand Khan And Ors.
Judges:
14 February, 1938·3. In our opinion, there is no force whatsoever in this plea. We are supported by authority of this Court. In Shadi Lal v. Jagdamba Sahai (1931) 18 A.I.R. All 655, a certain person sued for recovery of Rs. 14,000 in enforcement of a mortgage and the suit was decreed. The defendants appealed; but, du...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Auraiya Pay Office Of Imperial ... vs Notified Area Committee
Judges:
03 February, 1938·1. This is a reference under Section 162, U.P. Municipalities Act, Local Act 2 of 1916. It appears that during the hearing of an appeal under Section 160, the District Magistrate of Etawah entertained a reasonable doubt as to the principle of assessment of a tax imposed by the Notified Area of Aurai...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pt. Shyama Charan vs Mt. Anguri Devi
Judges:
03 February, 1938·1. This is a reference made by the learned Sessions Judge of Agra recommending that an order passed by a Bench of Magistrates on 18th August 1937 be set aside. The Magistrates passed an order against Shyama Charan under the provisions of Section 488(3), Criminal P.C., that he should be sentenced to ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahant Mangal Puri vs Mahant Baldeo Puri
Judges:
02 February, 1938·1. This is a reference by the District Judge of Jhansi, under Section 60(1), Stamp Act. A document was filed in Suit No. 26 of 1934 under which two houses were leased to certain persons and it was stipulated in the lease that if the owner wished to have the houses vacated, he was to give one month's...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Court Of Wards vs L. Ajodhia Prasad And Anr.
Judges:
01 February, 1938·No ward shall sue or be sued, nor shall any proceedings be taken in the Civil Court otherwise than by and in the name of the Collector in charge of his property or such other person as the Court of Wards may appoint in this behalf. 5. Learned Counsel for the defendant relies upon the case in Sri Tha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.